dc.contributor.author |
Hare, Christopher |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-02-09T21:56:56Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Cambridge Law Journal 69(1):16-19 2010 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0008-1973 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/11059 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
THE common law’s traditional reluctance to impose positive duties to safeguard others from the consequences of their own folly or others’ actions is evident in two recent High Court of Australia decisions, which considered whether operators of licensed premises owe their customers a duty to monitor their drinking or to protect them from the consequences of their own or other customers’ intoxication. |
en |
dc.language |
English |
en |
dc.publisher |
Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Cambridge Law Journal |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.subject |
Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Tort Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Negligence |
en |
dc.title |
Am I My (Drunken) Neighbour's Keeper? |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1017/S0008197310000073 |
en |
pubs.issue |
1 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
16 |
en |
pubs.volume |
69 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors |
en |
pubs.end-page |
19 |
en |
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
280959 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Law |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Faculty Administration Law |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2012-01-28 |
en |