Renvoi: Throwing (and catching) the boomerang

Schoeman, E

dc.contributor.author	Schoeman, E	en
dc.date.accessioned	2012-02-23T00:35:00Z	en
dc.date.issued	2006	en
dc.identifier.citation	University of Queensland Law Journal 25(1):203-212 2006	en
dc.identifier.issn	0083-4041	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2292/11707	en
dc.description.abstract	Few people would question the result in Neilson v Overseas Projects Corporation of Victoria Ltd:I In very general terms, an Australian court applied Australian law in a tort claim between two Australian parties. This seems eminently just and reasonable. However, the tort was not connnitted in Australia and the Australian conflict rule for tort refers to the exclusive application of the lex loci delicti commissi (lex loci delicti)? So, why was Australian law (to be more specific, Western Australian law) applied?	en
dc.publisher	University of Queensland Press	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	University of Queensland Law Journal	en
dc.rights	Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.	en
dc.rights.uri	https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm	en
dc.title	Renvoi: Throwing (and catching) the boomerang	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
pubs.issue	1	en
pubs.begin-page	203	en
pubs.volume	25	en
dc.rights.holder	Copyright: University of Queensland Press	en
pubs.author-url	http://search.informit.com.au.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/fullText;dn=20070315;res=AGISPT	en
pubs.end-page	212	en
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess	en
pubs.subtype	Article	en
pubs.elements-id	70722	en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date	2010-09-01	en