Renvoi: Throwing (and catching) the boomerang

Show simple item record Schoeman, E en 2012-02-23T00:35:00Z en 2006 en
dc.identifier.citation University of Queensland Law Journal 25(1):203-212 2006 en
dc.identifier.issn 0083-4041 en
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description.abstract Few people would question the result in Neilson v Overseas Projects Corporation of Victoria Ltd:I In very general terms, an Australian court applied Australian law in a tort claim between two Australian parties. This seems eminently just and reasonable. However, the tort was not connnitted in Australia and the Australian conflict rule for tort refers to the exclusive application of the lex loci delicti commissi (lex loci delicti)? So, why was Australian law (to be more specific, Western Australian law) applied? en
dc.publisher University of Queensland Press en
dc.relation.ispartofseries University of Queensland Law Journal en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri en
dc.title Renvoi: Throwing (and catching) the boomerang en
dc.type Journal Article en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 203 en
pubs.volume 25 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: University of Queensland Press en;dn=20070315;res=AGISPT en
pubs.end-page 212 en
dc.rights.accessrights en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 70722 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-09-01 en

Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Search ResearchSpace