dc.contributor.author |
Searchfield, Grant |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-02-23T00:46:29Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2011-01 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Evaluation & the Health Professions 34(4):421-428 Jan 2011 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0163-2787 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/11720 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
There is a desire among many tinnitus researchers and clinicians for greater standardization in the assessment and management of tinnitus. In their commentary on the complexity of tinnitus, Hoare et al. have highlighted the need for strong evidence-based protocols. The authors make many valid and important conclusions as to the current state of clinical guidelines; they identify clear gaps in evidence and limited consensus as to clinical practice. While I agree with the bulk of their commentary there are a few areas where I will offer a counter view. In particular I will address their view that only high-level evidence has a place in forming practice guidelines for tinnitus. |
en |
dc.publisher |
Sage Publications, Inc. |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Evaluation & the Health Professions |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0163-2787/ |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
A Commentary on the Complexity of Tinnitus Management: Clinical Guidelines Provide a Path Through the Fog |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1177/0163278710392983 |
en |
pubs.issue |
4 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
421 |
en |
pubs.volume |
34 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: Sage Publications, Inc. |
en |
dc.identifier.pmid |
21224266 |
en |
pubs.end-page |
428 |
en |
pubs.publication-status |
Accepted |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Discussion Paper |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
198701 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Medical and Health Sciences |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Population Health |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Audiology |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2011-01-02 |
en |
pubs.dimensions-id |
21224266 |
en |