Abstract:
The primary aim of this thesis is to investigate what the Independent Māori Statutory Board (IMSB) is, and examine the reasoning behind the Government's decision in 2009 not dedicate Māori seats on the Auckland 'Supercity' Council. The IMSB is the first of its kind in New Zealand, and has the potential of being adopted by other 'Supercity' councils if more local authorities are to be amalgamated. This thesis explains the primary role, purpose and functions of the IMSB as well its members, and questions also whether this is an effective model of allowing Māori to participate and be represented in a local authority, or whether this new Māori board is a 'token' gesture by the Government. This thesis also examines how the representatives of the IMSB were appointed and explains that the establishment process of the IMSB was not undemocratic but consistent with other forms of democracy and principles of tikanga Māori. By analysing current statutory provisions which refer to Māori participation and representation in local government, it is argued in this thesis that the marginalisation of Māori in local government is contrary to the rights that Māori possess under the Treaty of Waitangi and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Because of such rights, this thesis critiques the status quo and argues that amendments in law are needed to guarantee these rights for Māori in local government. This thesis also highlights the influence that political leaders' ideologies have on the majority non-Māori population. It is explained that in New Zealand, different forms of democracy can be in line with aspects of Māori culture and self-determining indigenous rights, but in order for the majority of the population to understand this, there needs to be a change in the way political leaders and commentators express their views to the wider public because these views often influence those of society.
