When Transmission Fails

Tucker, Christopher

dc.contributor.author	Tucker, Christopher	en
dc.date.accessioned	2012-03-04T19:15:39Z	en
dc.date.issued	2010	en
dc.identifier.citation	Philosophical Review 119:497-529 2010	en
dc.identifier.issn	0031-8108	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2292/12659	en
dc.description.abstract	One popular answer is that these deductions are instances of transmission failure (for example, Wright 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2008; Davies 1998, 2000, 2003; McLaughlin 2000; and Dretske 2005).1 Roughly, to say that NMD and ZD are instances of transmission failure is to say that they cannot transmit justification from their premises to their conclusions....	en
dc.publisher	Cornell University	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Philosophical Review	en
dc.rights	Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0031-8108/	en
dc.rights.uri	https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm	en
dc.title	When Transmission Fails	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1215/00318108-2010-012	en
pubs.begin-page	497	en
pubs.volume	119	en
dc.rights.holder	Copyright: Cornell University	en
pubs.end-page	529	en
pubs.publication-status	Published	en
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess	en
pubs.subtype	Article	en
pubs.elements-id	174377	en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date	2010-11-09	en