Significance of SSI and non-uniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response II: Effect on response with modular expansion joint

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chouw, Nawawi en
dc.contributor.author Hao, H en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-08T20:26:51Z en
dc.date.issued 2008 en
dc.identifier.citation Engineering Structures 30(1):154-162 2008 en
dc.identifier.issn 0141-0296 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/13521 en
dc.description.abstract This is the second part of the study of soil-structure interaction (SSI) and ground motion spatial variation effects on bridge pounding responses. The first part [1] concentrated on studying the responses of bridges with a traditional expansion joint between adjacent girders. The main objective of this second paper is to investigate the influence of spatial variation of ground motions and SSI on the minimum total gap that a modular expansion joint system (MEJS) between two bridge frames must have to prevent any pounding between the adjoined girders. This minimum total gap is critical in a MEJS design because it ensures intact expansion joint and adjacent girders. Additional investigations of pounding response with a large total gap of a MEJS are performed to study the characteristics of pounding responses when collision does occur e.g. due to unintended underestimation of the ground excitation magnitude, which may be different from the pounding responses between bridge girders with a small gap of a conventional expansion joint. The spatially varying ground excitations are simulated stochastically based on an empirical near-source response spectrum and an empirical coherency loss function. The investigation reveals that neglecting spatial variation of ground motions and SSI can significantly underestimate the total gap of a MEJS required to avoid pounding between the adjacent bridge girders. The results also show that pounding between girders with a large gap of a MEJS in general causes stronger impact forces. Compared with the results reported in the first part of this study, using a MEJS with a large gap is likely to completely preclude bridge girder pounding, and consequently to prevent local damage at the girder ends. However, a large girder movement results in large bending moment in bridge piers, which compensates the advantages of using MEJS in bridges to resist earthquake loading. en
dc.description.uri http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01410296 en
dc.publisher Elsevier en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Engineering Structures en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0141-0296/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Significance of SSI and non-uniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response II: Effect on response with modular expansion joint en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.02.020 en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 154 en
pubs.volume 30 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Elsevier en
pubs.end-page 162 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 74319 en
pubs.org-id Engineering en
pubs.org-id Civil and Environmental Eng en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-09-01 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics