Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Thompson, Benjamin en
dc.contributor.author Hansen, BC en
dc.contributor.author Hess, RF en
dc.contributor.author Troje, NF en
dc.coverage.spatial United States en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-11T18:55:53Z en
dc.date.issued 2007 en
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Vision 7(10):12.1-12.7 2007 en
dc.identifier.issn 1534-7362 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/13645 en
dc.description.abstract Biological motion perception, having both evolutionary and social importance, is performed by the human visual system with a high degree of sensitivity. It is unclear whether peripheral vision has access to the specialized neural systems underlying biological motion perception; however, given the motion component, one would expect peripheral vision to be, if not specialized, at least highly accurate in perceiving biological motion. Here we show that the periphery can indeed perceive biological motion. However, the periphery suffers from an inability to detect biological motion signals when they are embedded in dynamic visual noise. We suggest that this peripheral deficit is not due to biological motion perception per se, but to signal/noise segregation. en
dc.language eng en
dc.publisher Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Vision en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1534-7362/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Artifacts en
dc.subject Discrimination (Psychology) en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Male en
dc.subject Motion Perception en
dc.subject Orientation en
dc.subject Perceptual Masking en
dc.subject Photic Stimulation en
dc.subject Signal Detection, Psychological en
dc.subject Visual Fields en
dc.subject Walking en
dc.title Peripheral vision: good for biological motion, bad for signal noise segregation? en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1167/7.10.12 en
pubs.issue 10 en
pubs.begin-page 12.1 en
pubs.volume 7 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology en
dc.identifier.pmid 17997681 en
pubs.end-page 12.7 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 154737 en
dc.identifier.eissn 1534-7362 en
dc.identifier.pii /7/10/12/ en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2012-03-12 en
pubs.dimensions-id 17997681 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics