A single-blind, randomized, crossover trial of the effects of a nicotine pouch on the relief of tobacco withdrawal symptoms and user satisfaction.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Thornley, Simon en
dc.contributor.author McRobbie, Hayden en
dc.contributor.author Lin, Ruey en
dc.contributor.author Bullen, Christopher en
dc.contributor.author Hajek, P en
dc.contributor.author Laugesen, M en
dc.contributor.author Senior, Hugh en
dc.contributor.author Whittaker, Robyn en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-11T19:24:38Z en
dc.date.issued 2009 en
dc.identifier.citation Nicotine and Tobacco Research 11(6):715-721 Jun 2009 en
dc.identifier.issn 1462-2203 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/13654 en
dc.description.abstract Introduction We compared the effects of a 4-mg oral nicotine pouch (Zonnic pouch), with nicotine chewing gum and placebo pouch, on withdrawal discomfort after overnight tobacco abstinence. We also assessed participants’ preferences, satisfaction, and consumption patterns. Methods This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study of 30 adult smokers. After overnight tobacco abstinence, subjects reported on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0–100) tobacco withdrawal symptoms (craving, irritability, difficulty concentrating, and restlessness) before use and during the first hour after first product use. They then used the product throughout the study day and in the evening reported product usefulness, temporary abstinence success, and satisfaction. Results In a multivariate analysis, area under the curve (craving vs. time) was reduced by 23 points 60 min after taking the study medication in the nicotine pouch group, compared with 15- and 8-point decreases in the gum and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in craving ratings between the pouch and placebo was significant (p = .002). Nicotine pouch reduced irritability more than gum (difference = 9.86; p = .01). For pouch users, the odds ratio for temporary tobacco abstinence (21.5 hr) during study days (compared with gum) was 2.8 (95% CI = 0.8–8.1). Compared with the gum, the pouch was rated as significantly more “helpful to stop smoking” (difference = 20.6; 95% CI = 2.4–38.9) and “pleasant to use” (difference = 17.3; 95% CI = 2.6–32.0). Discussion The Zonnic pouch appears to be as effective at relieving craving as nicotine gum and was subjectively favored over the gum. These results suggest that the pouch will be a helpful addition to the range of existing nicotine replacement treatments. en
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Nicotine & Tobacco Research en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1462-2203/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title A single-blind, randomized, crossover trial of the effects of a nicotine pouch on the relief of tobacco withdrawal symptoms and user satisfaction. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/ntr/ntp054 en
pubs.issue 6 en
pubs.begin-page 715 en
pubs.volume 11 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Oxford University Press en
dc.identifier.pmid 19454549 en
pubs.end-page 721 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 87762 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Population Health en
pubs.org-id Epidemiology & Biostatistics en
pubs.org-id Pacific Health en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-09-01 en
pubs.dimensions-id 19454549 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics