dc.contributor.author |
Tobin, Audrey |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-03-11T22:11:25Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Common Law World Review 37(1):45-62 2008 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1473-7795 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/13719 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
In New Zealand access to court files in criminal proceedings is at the discretion of a judge or registrar. This article traces the way the rationale for the discretion changed over the last twenty years as the two French agents involved in the Rainbow Warrior bombing sought to prevent access to the court file containing the videotape showing their guilty pleas to a charge of manslaughter. Open justice and freedom of expression do not directly govern the exercise of the discretion but they are an essential part of the balancing process now undertaken by the Courts when requests are made to access Court files. |
en |
dc.publisher |
Vathek Publishing |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Common Law World Review |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1473-7795/ |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
Of Spies, a Ship and a Videotape - Stop, Pause, Play, Rewind, Play: Inspection and use of the Videotape of the Rainbow Warrior Court Proceedings |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1350/clwr.2008.37.1.161 |
en |
pubs.issue |
1 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
45 |
en |
pubs.volume |
37 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: Vathek Publishing |
en |
pubs.end-page |
62 |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
83945 |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2010-09-01 |
en |