On The Relation Among Some Definitions Of
Strategic Stability

Hillas, John; Jansen, Mathijis; Potters, Jos

dc.contributor.author	Hillas, John	en
dc.contributor.author	Jansen, Mathijis	en
dc.contributor.author	Potters, Jos	en
dc.date.accessioned	2006-11-30T20:53:14Z	en
dc.date.available	2006-11-30T20:53:14Z	en
dc.date.issued	2001	en
dc.identifier.citation	Department of Economics Working Paper Series 217	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2292/137	en
dc.description.abstract	In this paper we examine a number of different definitions of strategic stability and the relations among them. In particular, we show that the stability requirement given by Hillas (1990) is weaker than the requirements involved in the various definitions of stability in Mertens' reformulation of stability (Mertens 1989, 1991). To this end, we introduce a new de nition of stability and show that it is equivalent to (a variant of) the definition given by Hillas (1990). We also use the equivalence of our new de nition with the definition of Hillas to provide correct proofs of some of the results that were originally claimed (and incorrectly \proved") in Hillas (1990).	en
dc.format.extent	application/pdf	en
dc.format.mimetype	text	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	ResearchSpace@Auckland	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Department of Economics Working Paper Series (1997-2006)	en
dc.rights	Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.	en
dc.rights.uri	https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm	en
dc.source.uri	http://ideas.repec.org/p/ner/maastr/urnnbnnlui27-3970.html	en
dc.subject.other	Economics	en
dc.title	On The Relation Among Some Definitions Of Strategic Stability	en
dc.type	Working Paper	en
dc.rights.holder	Copyright: the author	en
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess	en
pubs.org-id	Economics	en