Maintaining the abstract critical facility in post-digital drawing practice

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Davis, Michael en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-15T01:29:36Z en
dc.date.issued 2010-10 en
dc.identifier.citation Interstices 11(The traction of drawing):82-90 Oct 2010 en
dc.identifier.issn 1170-585X en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/14424 en
dc.description.abstract Drawing practice has been significantly and irrevocably augmented through the advent of digital technologies. The term "post-digital" refers to a condition in which those technologies have been subsumed into the suite of tools at the disposal of designers. Such a condition renders the polemic of traditional versus new media, of pencil versus mouse, redundant. Building information modet diagram, render, collage, equation and script - each is understood as a form of drawing, each has its own predispositions and purposes. The qualities of the project that unfolds through the focused application of these tools is, as ever, a reflection of the abilities of designers to pursue ideas through drawing. And yet the "traditional versus digital" polemic, and the well-turned ground of the problem of the digital lying with its general tendency toward the production of visually- realistic images, is sustained by a lack of critical scrutiny based upon active engagement. With a critical base which relies solely upon observation grounded in conventional drawing, the digital remains "new" but somehow grows tired. This text proceeds on the understanding that what is required to address this broader concern is to accept the gift to drawing practice that its digital augmentation is and, through practical engagement to deal with the related imperative of critically (re-)evaluating and (re-)negotiating the role that each tool plays in drawing practice, and indeed of developing understandings of relationships between tools. en
dc.publisher Interstices en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Interstices: Journal of Architecture and Related Arts en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Maintaining the abstract critical facility in post-digital drawing practice en
dc.type Journal Article en
pubs.issue The traction of drawing en
pubs.begin-page 82 en
pubs.volume 11 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Interstices en
pubs.author-url http://interstices.aut.ac.nz/ijara/index.php/ijara/article/view/16 en
pubs.end-page 90 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 174497 en
pubs.org-id Creative Arts and Industries en
pubs.org-id Architecture and Planning en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-11-10 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics