Recent Work on Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Critics versus Defenders

Show simple item record Brock, Gillian en 2012-03-21T00:16:42Z en 2010 en
dc.identifier.citation American Philosophical Quarterly 47(1):85-101 2010 en
dc.identifier.issn 0003-0481 en
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description.abstract There is much current and growing interest in theorizing about global justice. Contemporary events in the world probably account for most of this, but if any philosophical text can be identi2ed as igniting theorists’ relatively newly found interest, it must be John Rawls’s in3uential book, The Law of Peoples (1999). There is a lively debate between critics and advocates of Rawls’s approach, and much theorizing about global justice is framed in terms of that exchange.1 Because of its enormous influence in shaping the terms of discussion, familiarity with this work is important for being able to participate in the current theoretical conversations about global justice. In this article I examine that debate and assess the state of play. en
dc.publisher University of Illinois Press en
dc.relation.ispartofseries American Philosophical Quarterly en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from en
dc.rights.uri en
dc.title Recent Work on Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Critics versus Defenders en
dc.type Journal Article en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 85 en
pubs.volume 47 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: University of Illinois Press en en
pubs.end-page 101 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 183053 en Arts en Humanities en Philosophy en
dc.identifier.eissn 2152-1123 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-11-24 en

Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Search ResearchSpace