Did the Waste Management audit failures signal lower firm-wide audit quality at Arthur Andersen?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cahan, Steven en
dc.contributor.author Zhang, W en
dc.contributor.author Veenman, D en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-21T22:41:25Z en
dc.date.issued 2011 en
dc.identifier.citation Contemporary Accounting Research 28(3):859-891 2011 en
dc.identifier.issn 0823-9150 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/14981 en
dc.description.abstract We examine Arthur Andersen’s audit quality in the 10 years before the collapse of Enron. During this period, Andersen was involved in a series of deficient audits, including Colonial Realty, Sunbeam, Waste Management, and the Baptist Foundation of Arizona. Andersen paid $512 million to settle lawsuits related to these audits, and each of the settlements were among the largest ever made by an audit firm in the pre-Enron period (Hawkins and Cohen 2003). 1 As Ball (2009) suggests, Andersen’s reputation had started to suffer even before Enron. Andersen’s involvement in the Waste Management audit was particularly damaging. In 1998, Waste Management restated its 1992–1996 pretax earnings by $1.43 billion, at the time the largest restatement in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) history. As Waste Management’s long-time auditor, Andersen was sued by the SEC for securities fraud. The SEC accused Andersen of issuing false and misleading audit reports and for acquiescing to managers at Waste Management. It was the first time the SEC had sued a major accounting firm because of a failed audit (Brickey 2004). Admitting no wrongdoing, Andersen settled the suit on June 19, 2001, by paying a then-record civil penalty of $7 million and agreeing to a permanent injunction that prohibited it from further violating securities laws. en
dc.publisher CAAA en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Contemporary Accounting Research en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0823-9150/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Did the Waste Management audit failures signal lower firm-wide audit quality at Arthur Andersen? en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01068.x en
pubs.issue 3 en
pubs.begin-page 859 en
pubs.volume 28 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: CAAA en
pubs.end-page 891 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 282080 en
pubs.org-id Business and Economics en
pubs.org-id Accounting and Finance en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2012-01-30 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics