dc.contributor.author |
Bandyopadhyay, Debasis |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2006-11-30T20:53:23Z |
en |
dc.date.available |
2006-11-30T20:53:23Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
1999 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Department of Economics Working Paper Series 194 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/151 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
This paper critically reviews conventional explanations of why the individual income reflects an industry premium. It presents four facts about industry premiums in New Zealand to highlight the limitation of those explanations. In particular, it suggests that competitive theories that refer to unobservable characteristics or compensating wage differentials are too broad and non-competitive theories that rely on the efficiency wage hypothesis are too narrow to successfully explain what the New Zealand data reveal. Employees receive industry
premium, but so do the self-employed, and do so more than the employees if uneducated; but the premium difference falls as the education level rises. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
application/pdf |
en |
dc.format.mimetype |
text |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
ResearchSpace@Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Department of Economics Working Paper Series (1997-2006) |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Economics |
en |
dc.title |
Industry Premium: What we Know and What The New Zealand Data Say |
en |
dc.type |
Working Paper |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: the author |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Economics |
en |