Homo ferus: the quest for evidence and explanation

Reference

Thesis (PhD--Sociology)--University of Auckland, 1985.

Degree Grantor

The University of Auckland

Abstract

Homo ferus, a term coined in the eighteenth century, has continued to be used in the same form or more commonly as feral man or feral child. The term refers to a marginal individual: marginal on account of minimal or abnormal socialisation resulting from isolation from human society. In its more extreme form, the isolation from human society is believed to be compounded by contact with wild animals - wolves, bears, and the like. The search for evidence for the existence of such individuals - from the earliest reports to the latest - is documented in this thesis. The documentation reveals significant patterns: a concentration of reports in European countries until the end of the eighteenth century, then in India in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and more recently in remoter regions of the world. Reasons for such temporal and spatial variations are explored in the thesis. Side by side with the search for evidence on homo ferus, there have also been attempts - from the eighteenth century onwards - to use that evidence in theoretical discussions, to examine the reliability of the evidence, and to explain the nature and origins of the evidence. Participants in these discussions have been many and varied, and the thesis is organised around the contributions of about thirty of them, considered in four separate chapters. In a partly chronological and partly thematic order, the four chapters describe the ways in which evidence relating to homo ferus has been used in eighteenth-century discussions on the contrast between the state of nature and civil society (Chapter One); in studies of folklore and of mental subnormality in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (Chapter Two); in debates on the relative importance of heredity and environment in the mid-twentieth century (Chapter Three); and in more recent discussions on the distinction between nature and culture (Chapter Four). Running through such diverse discussions is a common interest in defining the nature of humanity. The challenge to such definitions posed by marginal creatures possibly explains the fascination that homo ferus has exercised on both popular and scientific imagination.

Description

Full text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only.

DOI

Related Link

Keywords

ANZSRC 2020 Field of Research Codes