Factors associated with immunisation coverage and timeliness in New Zealand

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Grant, CC en
dc.contributor.author Turner, NM en
dc.contributor.author York, DG en
dc.contributor.author Goodyear-Smith, FA en
dc.contributor.author Petousis-Harris, HA en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-01T03:49:34Z en
dc.date.available 2012-05-01T03:49:34Z en
dc.date.issued 2010 en
dc.identifier.citation Br J Gen Pract 60(572):e113-e120 Mar 2010 en
dc.identifier.issn 0960-1643 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/17661 en
dc.description.abstract Background Immunisation coverage in New Zealand is lower than what is necessary to prevent large epidemics of pertussis. Primary care is where most immunisation delivery occurs. General practices vary in their structure and organisation, both in a general sense and specifically with respect to immunisation delivery. Aim To identify the structural and organisational characteristics of general practices associated with higher immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery. Design of study A random sample of practices during 2005 and 2006. Setting General practices in the Auckland and Midland regions, with over-sampling of indigenous Maori governance practices. Method Practice immunisation coverage and timeliness were measured. Primary care practice characteristics relevant to immunisation delivery by the practice were described. Associations of these practice characteristics with higher practice immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery were determined. Results A total of 124 (61%) of 205 eligible practices were recruited. A median (25th to 75th centile) of 71% (57–77%) of registered children at each practice were fully immunised, and 56% (40–64%) had no immunisation delay. In multivariate analyses, both practice immunisation coverage (P<0.001) and timeliness (P<0.001) decreased with increased social deprivation. After adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation, region, and governance, immunisation coverage and timeliness were better at practices that enrolled children at a younger age (coverage: P = 0.002; timeliness P = 0.007), used one of the four available practice management systems (coverage: P<0.001; timeliness: P = 0.006), and had no staff shortages (coverage: P = 0.027; timeliness: P = 0.021). Conclusion Practice immunisation coverage and timeliness vary widely in New Zealand. General organisational and structural aspects of general practices are key determinants of general practice immunisation delivery. en
dc.relation.ispartofseries British Journal of General Practice en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.source.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X483535 en
dc.title Factors associated with immunisation coverage and timeliness in New Zealand en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.3399/bjgp10X483535 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: British Journal of General Practice en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.elements-id 102800 en
pubs.org-id Faculty of Medical & Hlth Sci en
pubs.org-id Population Health en
pubs.org-id Gen.Practice& Primary Hlthcare en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Paediatrics Department en
pubs.org-id Other Academic Activities en
pubs.org-id Centre for Continuing Education en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics