A Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy for multiple sclerosis fatigue

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author van Kessel, K en
dc.contributor.author Moss-Morris, R en
dc.contributor.author Willoughby, E en
dc.contributor.author Chalder, T en
dc.contributor.author Johnson, Malcolm en
dc.contributor.author Robinson, Elizabeth en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-24T21:19:27Z en
dc.date.issued 2008-02 en
dc.identifier.citation PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE 70(2):205-213 01 Feb 2008 en
dc.identifier.issn 0033-3174 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/18383 en
dc.description.abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue. Methods: A randomized controlled design was used where 72 patients with MS fatigue were randomly assigned to eight weekly sessions of CBT or relaxation training (RT). RT was designed to control for therapist time and attention. Participants were assessed before and after treatment, and at 3 and 6 months posttreatment. The primary outcome was the Fatigue Scale. Secondary outcomes included measures of stress, mood, and fatigue-related impairment. Results: Analysis was by intention-to-treat. A group by time interaction showed that the CBT group reported significantly greater reductions in fatigue across the 8 months compared with the RT group (p < .02). Calculated effect sizes for fatigue from baseline to the end of treatment were 3.03 [95% confidence interval, 2.22–3.68] for the CBT group and 1.83 [95% confidence interval, 1.26–2.34] for the RT group. Results also indicted that both groups showed clinically significant decreases in fatigue defined as fatigue levels equivalent or less than those reported by a nonfatigued healthy comparison group. There were no significant interactions between group and any of the secondary outcome variables, with both groups showing improvements over time on all measures. Interpretation: Both CBT and RT appear to be clinically effective treatments for fatigue in MS patients, although the effects for CBT are greater than those for RT. Even 6 months after treatment, both treatment groups reported levels of fatigue equivalent to those of the healthy comparison group. en
dc.language EN en
dc.publisher American Psychosomatic Society en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Psychosomatic Medicine en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0033-3174/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject multiple sclerosis en
dc.subject fatigue en
dc.subject cognitive behavior therapy en
dc.subject randomized controlled trial en
dc.subject DOUBLE-BLIND en
dc.subject CROSSOVER TRIAL en
dc.subject SCALE en
dc.subject AMANTADINE en
dc.subject DEPRESSION en
dc.subject IMPAIRMENT en
dc.subject PERCEPTION en
dc.subject PEMOLINE en
dc.subject FITNESS en
dc.subject PLACEBO en
dc.title A Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy for multiple sclerosis fatigue en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181643065 en
pubs.issue 2 en
pubs.begin-page 205 en
pubs.volume 70 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: American Psychosomatic Society en
dc.identifier.pmid 18256342 en
pubs.end-page 213 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 114788 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2011-09-26 en
pubs.dimensions-id 18256342 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics