Testing the Effect of Environmental Distraction: An Innovative Procedure for Improving Differential Diagnosis and Ecological Validity of the Neuropsychological Assessment

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kydd, R en
dc.contributor.advisor Gorman, D en
dc.contributor.author Schnabel, Ralf en
dc.date.accessioned 2013-02-25T02:52:24Z en
dc.date.issued 2013 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/20063 en
dc.description.abstract Traditional neuropsychological assessments are conducted exclusively in a quiet, distraction‐free environment; clients’ abilities to operate under busy and distracting conditions remain untested. Environmental distractions, however, are typical for a multitude of real‐life situations and present a challenge to clients with frontal‐temporal brain injury. In an effort to improve ecological validity, an extension of the traditional neuropsychological assessment was developed, comprising a standardised distraction‐condition. This allowed cognitive functions to be tested both in the traditional setting and with exposure to a specified audio‐visual distraction. The problem of practiceeffects arising from re‐testing clients in two conditions was resolved by developing a set of alternative test stimuli that which can be used interchangeably with the standard stimuli. A first study (n=240), comprising clients with mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) (n=80), clients with Major Depression (MDE) (n=80), and a healthy control sample (n=80), was undertaken to validate the equivalence of the alternative stimuli. The second study (n=240) investigated how clients with mTBI (n=80), clients with MDE (n=80), and a healthy control sample (n=80) performed on sub‐tests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale‐IV and the Wechsler Memory Scale‐IV both in the standard and the distraction conditions. Significant deterioration of performance in the distraction setting was observed among clients with mTBI. In contrast, the performance of a healthy control sample remained unchanged. Significant improvement of performance in the distraction setting was documented for clients with MDE. Contrary to their improved performance, depressed clients experienced the distraction setting as more distressing than the control group and the mTBI group. Keywords: Environmental Distraction, Neuropsychological Assessment, Ecological Validity, Environmental Distraction, Traumatic Brain Injury, Major Depressive Episode, Practice Effect en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof PhD Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Testing the Effect of Environmental Distraction: An Innovative Procedure for Improving Differential Diagnosis and Ecological Validity of the Neuropsychological Assessment en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Doctoral en
thesis.degree.name PhD en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The Author en
pubs.elements-id 373666 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2013-02-25 en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112903965


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics