A collaborative resource to build consensus for automated left ventricular segmentation of cardiac MR images.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Suinesiaputra, Avan en
dc.contributor.author Cowan, Brett en
dc.contributor.author Al-Agamy, AO en
dc.contributor.author Elattar, MA en
dc.contributor.author Ayache, N en
dc.contributor.author Fahmy, AS en
dc.contributor.author Khalifa, AM en
dc.contributor.author Medrano Gracia, Pau en
dc.contributor.author Jolly, MP en
dc.contributor.author Kadish, AH en
dc.contributor.author Lee, DC en
dc.contributor.author Margeta, J en
dc.contributor.author Warfield, SK en
dc.contributor.author Young, Alistair en
dc.coverage.spatial Netherlands en
dc.date.accessioned 2014-01-29T02:42:50Z en
dc.date.issued 2014-01 en
dc.identifier.citation Medical Image Analysis 18(1):50-62 Jan 2014 en
dc.identifier.issn 1361-8415 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/21492 en
dc.description.abstract A collaborative framework was initiated to establish a community resource of ground truth segmentations from cardiac MRI. Multi-site, multi-vendor cardiac MRI datasets comprising 95 patients (73 men, 22 women; mean age 62.73±11.24years) with coronary artery disease and prior myocardial infarction, were randomly selected from data made available by the Cardiac Atlas Project (Fonseca et al., 2011). Three semi- and two fully-automated raters segmented the left ventricular myocardium from short-axis cardiac MR images as part of a challenge introduced at the STACOM 2011 MICCAI workshop (Suinesiaputra et al., 2012). Consensus myocardium images were generated based on the Expectation-Maximization principle implemented by the STAPLE algorithm (Warfield et al., 2004). The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values ranged between 0.63 and 0.85, 0.60 and 0.98, 0.56 and 0.94, and 0.83 and 0.92, respectively, against the STAPLE consensus. Spatial and temporal agreement varied in different amounts for each rater. STAPLE produced high quality consensus images if the region of interest was limited to the area of discrepancy between raters. To maintain the quality of the consensus, an objective measure based on the candidate automated rater performance distribution is proposed. The consensus segmentation based on a combination of manual and automated raters were more consistent than any particular rater, even those with manual input. The consensus is expected to improve with the addition of new automated contributions. This resource is open for future contributions, and is available as a test bed for the evaluation of new segmentation algorithms, through the Cardiac Atlas Project (www.cardiacatlas.org). en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Medical Image Analysis en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1361-8415/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject Consensus images en
dc.subject LV myocardium en
dc.subject Segmentation challenge en
dc.title A collaborative resource to build consensus for automated left ventricular segmentation of cardiac MR images. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.media.2013.09.001 en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 50 en
pubs.volume 18 en
dc.description.version AM - Accepted Manuscript en
dc.identifier.pmid 24091241 en
pubs.end-page 62 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 407342 en
pubs.org-id Bioengineering Institute en
pubs.org-id ABI Associates en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Medical Sciences en
pubs.org-id Anatomy and Medical Imaging en
dc.identifier.eissn 1361-8423 en
dc.identifier.pii S1361-8415(13)00121-7 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2014-01-29 en
pubs.dimensions-id 24091241 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics