General Dynamic Dynamic Logic

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Girard, Patrick en
dc.contributor.author Seligman, Jeremy en
dc.contributor.author Liu, F en
dc.contributor.editor Bolander, T en
dc.contributor.editor Brauner, T en
dc.contributor.editor Ghilardi, S en
dc.contributor.editor Moss, L en
dc.coverage.spatial Copenhagen, Denmark en
dc.date.accessioned 2014-02-12T23:22:22Z en
dc.date.issued 2012 en
dc.identifier.citation In Advances in Modal Logic: volume 9. Editors: Bolander T, Brauner T, Ghilardi S, Moss L. 9: 239-260. College Publications, London, UK 2012 en
dc.identifier.isbn 1848900686 en
dc.identifier.isbn 9781848900684 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/21600 en
dc.description.abstract Dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) extends purely modal epistemic logic (S5) by adding dynamic operators that change the model structure. Propositional dynamic logic (PDL) extends basic modal logic with programs that allow the definition of complex modalities. We provide a common generalisation: a logic that is `dynamic' in both senses, and one that is not limited to S5 as its modal base. It also incorporates, and significantly generalises, all the features of existing extensions of DEL such as BMS [3] and LCC [21]. Our dynamic operators work in two steps. First, they provide a multiplicity of transformations of the original model, one for each `action' in a purely syntactic `action structure' (in the style of BMS). Second, they specify how to combine these multiple copies to produce a new model. In each step, we use the generality of PDL to specify the transformations. The main technical contribution of the paper is to provide an axiomatisation of this `general dynamic dynamic logic' (GDDL). This is done by providing a computable translation of GDDL formulas to equivalent PDL formulas, thus reducing the logic to PDL, which is decidable. The proof involves switching between representing programs as terms and as automata. We also show that both BMS and LCC are special cases of GDDL, and that there are interesting applications that require the additional generality of GDDL, namely the modelling of private belief update. More recent extensions and variations of BMS and LCC are also discussed. en
dc.description.uri http://www.aiml.net/volumes/volume9/ en
dc.publisher College Publications en
dc.relation.ispartof Advances in modal logic (AiML) 2012 en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Advances in modal logic en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title General Dynamic Dynamic Logic en
dc.type Conference Item en
pubs.begin-page 239 en
pubs.volume 9 en
pubs.author-url http://www.aiml.net/volumes/volume9/Girard-Seligman-Liu.pdf en
pubs.end-page 260 en
pubs.finish-date 2012-08-25 en
pubs.place-of-publication London, UK en
pubs.start-date 2012-08-22 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Proceedings en
pubs.elements-id 365449 en
pubs.org-id Arts en
pubs.org-id Humanities en
pubs.org-id Philosophy en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2012-11-28 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics