Assessment without action; a randomised evaluation of the interRAI home care compared to a national assessment tool on identification of needs and service provision for older people in New Zealand.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Parsons, Matthew en
dc.contributor.author Senior, H en
dc.contributor.author Mei-Hu Chen, X en
dc.contributor.author Jacobs, Stephen en
dc.contributor.author Parsons, John en
dc.contributor.author Sheridan, Nicolette en
dc.contributor.author Kenealy, Timothy en
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-06T03:58:23Z en
dc.date.issued 2013-09 en
dc.identifier.citation Health and Social Care in the Community, 2013, 21 (5), pp. 536 - 544 en
dc.identifier.issn 0966-0410 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/23130 en
dc.description.abstract Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is considered the cornerstone of good practice, as it identifies need across multiple domains such as social, physical and psychological. The interRAI home care (interRAI-HC), probably the most well-researched and supported community-based CGA has been implemented globally, often at considerable expense. Policy-makers, managers and clinicians anticipate significant gains in health outcomes following such investment; however, the implementation of CGA is often undertaken in the absence of community service development. This study sought to compare the interRAI-HC with an existing CGA [the Support Needs Assessment (SNA)] in community-dwelling older people. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken from January 2006 to January 2007 comparing the interRAI-HC and the SNA in 316 people (65+) referred for assessment of needs with follow-up at 1 and 4 months. Outcomes included health-related quality of life, physical function, social support, cognitive status, mood and health service usage as well as identified need. The study found that significantly more support needs were identified using the interRAI-HC compared to the SNA. More social and carer support were recommended by SNA and more rehabilitation and preventive health screens were recommended by interRAI-HC. Despite these differences, the mean healthcare use was similar at 4 months, although interRAI-HC participants had more Emergency Department presentations and hospital admissions. No statistically significant differences between groups were reported in terms of outcomes. In conclusion, the interRAI-HC was found to identify more unmet support needs than the SNA though resulted in no favourable outcomes for the older person or their carer. The study highlights the need to invest attention around the service context to maximise outcomes based on identified needs. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Health and Social Care in the Community en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0966-0410/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Geriatric Assessment en
dc.subject Questionnaires en
dc.subject Needs Assessment en
dc.subject Aged en
dc.subject Aged, 80 and over en
dc.subject Home Care Services en
dc.subject Health Services Accessibility en
dc.subject New Zealand en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Male en
dc.title Assessment without action; a randomised evaluation of the interRAI home care compared to a national assessment tool on identification of needs and service provision for older people in New Zealand. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/hsc.12045 en
pubs.issue 5 en
pubs.begin-page 536 en
pubs.volume 21 en
dc.identifier.pmid 23639071 en
pubs.end-page 544 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 379954 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Nursing en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Medicine Department en
dc.identifier.eissn 1365-2524 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2014-10-06 en
pubs.dimensions-id 23639071 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics