Teachers' conceptions of assessment in Chinese contexts: A tripartite model of accountability, improvement, and irrelevance

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brown, Gavin en
dc.contributor.author Hui, SKF en
dc.contributor.author Yu, FWM en
dc.contributor.author Kennedy, KJ en
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-22T03:41:59Z en
dc.date.issued 2011 en
dc.identifier.citation International Journal of Educational Research, 2011, 50 (5-6), pp. 307 - 320 en
dc.identifier.issn 0883-0355 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/23304 en
dc.description.abstract The beliefs teachers have about assessment influence classroom practices and reflect cultural and societal differences. This paper reports the development of a new self-report inventory to examine beliefs teachers in Hong Kong and southern China contexts have about the nature and purpose of assessment. A statistically equivalent model for Hong Kong and southern China teachers had three factors (i.e., improvement, accountability, and irrelevance). The Chinese teachers very strongly associated accountability with improvement (r = .80). This is consistent with the Chinese tradition and policy of using examinations to drive teaching quality and student learning and as a force for merit based decisions. Small differences between the two groups of teachers are consistent with assessment policy differences in the two jurisdictions. en
dc.publisher Elsevier Science en
dc.relation.ispartofseries International Journal of Educational Research en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy#accepted-author-manuscript http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0883-0355/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Teachers' conceptions of assessment in Chinese contexts: A tripartite model of accountability, improvement, and irrelevance en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijer.2011.10.003 en
pubs.issue 5-6 en
pubs.begin-page 307 en
pubs.volume 50 en
dc.description.version AM - Accepted Manuscript en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Elsevier Science en
pubs.end-page 320 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 238721 en
pubs.org-id Education and Social Work en
pubs.org-id Learning Development and Professional Practice en
dc.identifier.eissn 1873-538X en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2012-08-04 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics