dc.contributor.author |
Pettigrove, Glen |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-11-25T23:51:34Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2012-01 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Ethics, 2012, 122 (2), pp. 341 - 370 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0014-1704 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/23585 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
If asked to generate a list of virtues, most people would not include meekness. So it is surprising that Hume deems it not only a virtue, but one whose "tendency to the good of society no one can doubt of." After explaining what Hume and his contemporaries meant by ‘meekness’, the essay proceeds to argue that meekness is a virtue we, too, should endorse. |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Ethics |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://press.uchicago.edu/journals/jrnl_rights.html#faq8
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0014-1704/ |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
Meekness and 'moral' anger |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1086/663230 |
en |
pubs.issue |
2 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
341 |
en |
pubs.volume |
122 |
en |
dc.description.version |
AM - Accepted Manuscript |
en |
pubs.end-page |
370 |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
340943 |
en |
dc.identifier.eissn |
1539-297X |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2012-08-24 |
en |