Cerebral Protection by Lidocaine During Cardiac Operations: A Follow-Up Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mitchell, Simon en
dc.contributor.author Merry, Alan en
dc.contributor.author Frampton, C en
dc.contributor.author Davies, Elaine en
dc.contributor.author Mills, Brigid en
dc.contributor.author Webster, Craig en
dc.contributor.author Milsom, Paget en
dc.contributor.author Willcox, TW en
dc.contributor.author Gorman, Desmond en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-07T22:15:28Z en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-17T01:52:49Z en
dc.date.issued 2009 en
dc.identifier.citation Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009, 87 (3), pp. 820 - 825 (6) en
dc.identifier.issn 0003-4975 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/24547 en
dc.description.abstract Background A previous study showed less postoperative neurocognitive impairment in open-chamber cardiac surgery patients given lidocaine for 48 hours after induction of anesthesia. In the present study, we aimed to test the benefit of a 12-hour infusion in a broader group of cardiac surgery patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, intention-to-treat trial. Before cardiac surgery, 158 patients completed 7 neurocognitive tests and a self-rating scale for memory. They received a 12-hour infusion of either lidocaine in a standard antiarrhythmic dose or placebo, beginning at induction of anesthesia. The cognitive tests and memory scale were repeated at postoperative weeks 10 and 25. A deficit in any cognitive test was defined as a decline in score by more than or equal to the preoperative group standard deviation. Results All tests were completed by 118 and 107 patients at 10 and 25 weeks, respectively. The proportions of patients in the lidocaine and placebo groups exhibiting a deficit in one or more tests were as follows: 45.8% versus 40.7% at 10 weeks, and 35.2% versus 37.7% at 25 weeks (not significant). There were no significant differences between groups in self-ratings of memory function or length of intensive care unit or hospital stay. Conclusions Lidocaine was not neuroprotective. The result of the previous trial may represent a type 1 error. Alternatively, benefit may be more likely for open-chamber surgery patients exposed to larger numbers of emboli or with a longer lidocaine infusion. en
dc.publisher The Society of Thoracic Surgeons en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Annals of Thoracic Surgery en
dc.relation.replaces http://hdl.handle.net/2292/13347 en
dc.relation.replaces 2292/13347 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0003-4975/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Cerebral Protection by Lidocaine During Cardiac Operations: A Follow-Up Study en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.042 en
pubs.issue 3 en
pubs.begin-page 820 en
pubs.volume 87 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons en
dc.identifier.pmid 19231397 en
pubs.end-page 825 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 84714 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Anaesthesiology en
pubs.org-id Cent Medical & Hlth Sci Educat en
pubs.org-id Medicine Department en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-09-01 en
pubs.dimensions-id 19231397 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics