UK Competitiveness, Sustainable Development and Corporate Taxation: Using the Corporation Tax to Promote Increased Resource Productivity in line with the Law and Policy of the European Union

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bowler Smith, Mark en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-10T02:55:26Z en
dc.date.issued 2012-04-28 en
dc.date.submitted 2011-09-11 en
dc.identifier.citation Sub type: PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge, 2012 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/24808 en
dc.description.abstract While tax lawyers tend to deal with questions of equity, economists, when considering matters of taxation, tend to focus on efficiency. This division of labour has meant missed opportunities both in considering the optimal and practicable scope of individual taxes from first principles and in informing the subsequent task of detailing the law by reference to the economics literature. Without a principled approach, a rational taxpayer may never be in the position that he can expect prosperity, as well as fairness, from tax law. The thesis starts from the normative proposition that the tax system, while not uniquely, should be exclusively concerned with the redistribution and maximisation of wealth. However, due to the effective incidence ambiguity of the corporate income tax, it is prudent to assume that direct taxes on corporations, in general, do not lend themselves to the redistribution of wealth. The underlying reasoning is that the effective incidence of a tax is fundamental to tax equity and without a clear understanding of the equity of a particular tax, it is impossible to assess the redistributional effects of that tax. In sum, incidence ambiguity means that it is not possible to determine the redistributional effects of the corporate income tax and this might also be true of other forms of direct corporate taxation. Moreover, the corporate income tax might, in fact, be regressive. Accordingly, corporate taxation should focus on the objective of wealth maximisation. However, the corporate income tax is not wealth maximising for broadly two reasons. First, it taxes undistributed profits (potential investment capital), which militates against the core societal function of the corporation - the pooling of resources towards the creation of wealth. Secondly, it is hidebound by the doctrine of tax neutrality, which prevents it from becoming a more effective tool of government policy. Despite the failure of the corporate income tax, a wealth maximising corporation tax does become possible when efficiency is understood as the optimal - rather than the ‘market’ - allocation of resources. This restatement of efficiency frees corporate 4 taxation from the constraints of tax neutrality and allows it to explore its functionality as a mechanism of, albeit carefully focused, 'operant conditioning' (voluntary behaviour modification). This functionality allows corporate taxation to proactively embrace the competitiveness policy agenda in accord with the 'new' Lisbon Strategy and Article 2 of the Treaty Establishing the European Community. These considerations motivate this thesis to outline a new idea for a wealth maximising corporation tax. The 'European Competitiveness Tax' is designed so as to promote both the productivity of large European domiciled corporations and the competitiveness of Member States and it exists within a framework of democratic subsidiarity and controlled tax competition. The literature on corporate and national competitiveness informs the definition of the tax base, as well as the formulation of a tax credit, which taken together, reward directly the voluntary competitive behaviour of both corporations and municipalities. In Part II, the thesis explores why neither the corporate income tax (with a particular focus on the UK Corporation Tax) nor European corporate tax law maximises wealth or promotes competitiveness and why both, therefore, are at odds with the taxation of large European corporations. Not only are some of the major elements of the corporate income tax put under a microscope and found wanting, but also more general justifications for the tax as a whole are analysed for any promise of wealth maximisation. In respect of European tax law, the main focus is on a path dependent development of the law in the absence of any kind of purpose-built European corporate tax regime. Consideration is also given, as it is at the start of the thesis, to the wealth maximising credentials of corporate tax law harmonisation. en
dc.publisher University of Cambridge en
dc.relation.ispartof PhD Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title UK Competitiveness, Sustainable Development and Corporate Taxation: Using the Corporation Tax to Promote Increased Resource Productivity in line with the Law and Policy of the European Union en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.grantor University of Cambridge en
thesis.degree.level Doctoral en
thesis.degree.name PhD en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The Author en
pubs.author-url http://search.lib.cam.ac.uk/?itemid=%7Cmanuscrpdb%7C34835 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.elements-id 409407 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2013-11-18 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics