Abstract:
I present a discussion of honesty within the framework of Aristotle’s parameter doctrine. Chapter 1 is about the parameter of the “right objects” which is primarily where intellectual honesty fits in; it aims to be a somewhat Wittgensteinian account, which argues that forming beliefs and acquiring knowledge are not only of epistemological concern, but also a matter of ethics. Chapter 2 considers communicating the relevant truth in the “right way”, which has two sides. On the one hand it involves communicating in such a manner that makes it clear whether one is sharing facts, opinions, or beliefs and on the other hand it involves the right manner of communication. The first aspect involves differentiating between the different types of propositions and acknowledging our fallibility. I also found it interesting to examine the role predictions and intentions play in the way we communicate. In Chapter 3 I examine (honestly) communicating at the “right times” which yields a discussion of why tact isn’t a virtue. I also discuss Aristotle’s doctrine of disjoint spheres and why it makes sense to regard the virtues as overlapping and intertwined. I also consider how communicating ageappropriately relates to honesty. Communicating (honestly) with the right people raises juicy issues in Chapter 4, such as honest agents telling lies, privacy (not everyone has a right to hear the whole truth) and gossip. Chapter 5 looks at the right motives for honesty which also considers the vital role that self-awareness has for an honest agent, issues of engaging with reality, virtual realities and escapism. I end in Chapter 6 with a thorough discussion of moral development and phronesis (practical wisdom), which leads on to examining why perfect virtue is (or rather should be) painted as an unattainable ideal. Throughout this last chapter I compare the accounts of Howard Curzer and Julia Annas. This final chapter also briefly addresses Aristotle’s notion of natural virtue. My discussion aims to be guided by a modification of Aristotle’s insight, namely that we should inquire both in order to know what virtue is and in order to become good.