A Comparative Study of Physician-Writers’ Representations of What Makes a Good Doctor

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Chung, H en
dc.contributor.advisor Hanne, M en
dc.contributor.author Guo, Yan en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-07T21:11:08Z en
dc.date.issued 2014 en
dc.identifier.citation 2014 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/25024 en
dc.description.abstract This thesis draws on the work of the Narrative Medicine movement and offers for the firsttime a comparative study of the creative representations of what makes a good doctor byeight physician-writers from a range of cultural backgrounds. What makes a good doctor isone of the central concerns in medical practice, especially as medicine is increasinglycriticised for being practised too scientifically and technically and with insufficient artistryand humanity. Creative works by the eight doctor-writers offer readers a much more humanunderstanding of the challenges involved in being a good doctor, compared with more seriousand less accessible scholarly and academic writings. The eight doctor-writers chosen for thisstudy represent those most quoted with respect to questions of medical ethics in their owntime and place. The study takes an innovative comparative approach that lifts the question ofthe literary treatment of what constitutes good medical practice beyond the context of a singleauthor or cultural context to enable the illumination of this question from multipleperspectives. The comparative reading of these works not only reveals the extent to whicheach doctor’s representation of the good doctor is influenced by such specificities as the formof writing, the doctor’s gender and specialty and the socio-cultural contexts on which thework is written, but also shows a remarkable commonality of concerns that transcends thesespecificities. The study is primarily carried out in Western cultural and medical contexts,although a Chinese physician-writer is introduced for comparison so as to add a valuableextra dimension to the discussion of what makes a good doctor. In the field of medicalhumanities, this research provides a complementary literary approach to current studies inmedical education; meanwhile in the field of comparative literature, it provides the firstsystematic study of “doctors who write creatively”.Keywordscomparative literature, physician-writers, creative writing, what makes a good doctor,medicine and literature, Narrative Medicine. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof PhD Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby 99264797013702091 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title A Comparative Study of Physician-Writers’ Representations of What Makes a Good Doctor en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Comparative Literature en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Doctoral en
thesis.degree.name PhD en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The Author en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.elements-id 479670 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2015-04-08 en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112905394


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics