Presentations of Crime and Punishment in the Saw Franchise

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Oleson, J en
dc.contributor.author MacKinnon, Tamara en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-03T22:41:28Z en
dc.date.issued 2015 en
dc.identifier.citation 2015 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/25736 en
dc.description Full text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this thesis was to develop a deeper understanding of the Saw film franchise. While the franchise was dubbed ‘torture porn’ by David Edelstein (2006), creating a wealth of negative connotations, it has achieved the title of the world’s “most successful horror film series” (Guinness World Records, 2015) . The research was conducted from a cultural criminological perspective, placing emphasis on mass media and popular “constructions...of crime and crime control” (Ferrell, 1999, p. 395) to discover some of the key themes involved in the franchise, what these themes represent, and what they mean for society. After all, crime films act as a mirror aimed at the world, reflecting social attitudes and assumptions (Rafter, 2000, p. 21). A thematic analysis was conducted and eight significant themes were extracted: torture, trap, game, crime, survival, punishment, justice, serial killer. This thesis took a qualitative approach to obtain richer and more informative data, leading to more enhanced results that would not be so easily achieved through a quantitative study (Tewksbury, 2009). The results of the analysis revealed a hierarchy among the themes and quantitative graphs were included to complement and reinforce patterns in the findings. It was discovered that theme frequency within the films did not equate with richness of material. The discussion related the themes to broader literature, aiming to support the notion that Saw is more philosophical than it appears on the surface. Saw, through the portrayal of serial kill John Kramer, acts as a forum for discussion on attitudes towards crime and punishment, the importance of the survival instinct, playing by the rules of the ‘game’, social justice, and the purpose of torture and violence in today’s ‘wound culture’ (Seltzer, 1998). Saw operates as a coping mechanism for reflecting on and dealing with the stresses of living in a post 9/11 climate (Kattelman, 2009). Saw works as a teaching tool, method of social control, and enhancer of social solidarity by emphasising prevailing norms (Durkheim, 1958). In the end, Saw functions like a folk tale, using violence to create memorable impressions so that audiences can pass on the important messages. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA99264778884502091 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights Restricted Item. Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title Presentations of Crime and Punishment in the Saw Franchise en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Criminology en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Masters en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The Author en
pubs.elements-id 488009 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2015-06-04 en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112909770


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics