Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: A 15-year experience

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pacella, SJ en
dc.contributor.author Vogel, JE en
dc.contributor.author Locke, Michelle en
dc.contributor.author Codner, MA en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-23T02:43:33Z en
dc.date.issued 2011 en
dc.identifier.citation Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2011, 31 (2), pp. 190 - 199 (10) en
dc.identifier.issn 1090-820X en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/26371 en
dc.description.abstract Background: The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and implant breast reconstruction procedure has undergone many refinements over its lifetime. In fact, the authors have made many aesthetic and technical refinements to their own approach to breast reconstruction. Objectives: The authors review the historical progression of latissimus flap and breast reconstruction techniques and compare these to their own 15-year experience. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all latissimus and implant breast reconstructions performed by the senior author (MAC) from July 1994 to June 2009, for a total of 52 procedures in 31 patients. Surgical and oncological data, complications, and outcomes data were recorded. Results: The mean age of the patients at time of surgery was 47.6 years. Average mastectomy weight was 283 grams and average final implant volume was 364 cc. Average follow-up was three years, four months. Of the 52 total procedures, 34.6% were immediate breast reconstructions utilizing skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM); 13.5% of the reconstructed breasts also had preservation of the areola (areolar-sparing mastectomy [ASM]). The most common complication was donor site seroma (40.4%). Aesthetic and surgical refinements identified over the time period included the adoption of SSM and ASM techniques, immediate nipple reconstruction, the placement of an adjustable saline implant to allow for postoperative size adjustment, and implant placement in the prepectoral position. The overall latissimus dorsi implant reconstruction success rate was 94.2% (49/52). Conclusions: The data demonstrated a successful outcome for latissimus dorsi and implant breast reconstruction for patients with a low or normal body mass index and a small (A to C cup) breast size. The aesthetic outcome of latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction has been improved over the past 15 years by the adoption of SSM and ASM techniques. Immediate nipple reconstruction and the placement of an adjustable saline implant potentially render this procedure a true single-stage reconstruction. Prepectoral implant position provides good aesthetics while preserving the subpectoral space for future management of capsular contracture if required. en
dc.language English en
dc.publisher SAGE Publications en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Aesthetic Surgery Journal en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1090-820X/ http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/access-purchase/rights-and-permissions/self-archiving-policyb.html en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject Science & Technology en
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine en
dc.subject Surgery en
dc.subject SURGERY en
dc.subject implants en
dc.subject breast surgery en
dc.subject breast reconstruction en
dc.subject SKIN-SPARING MASTECTOMY en
dc.subject POTENTIALLY UNFAVORABLE RESULT en
dc.subject TISSUE EXPANDERS en
dc.subject FLAP en
dc.subject AREOLA en
dc.subject CANCER en
dc.title Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: A 15-year experience en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/1090820X10395506 en
pubs.issue 2 en
pubs.begin-page 190 en
pubs.volume 31 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: SAGE Publications en
dc.identifier.pmid 21317117 en
pubs.author-url http://asj.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/2/190 en
pubs.end-page 199 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.subtype Journal en
pubs.elements-id 429200 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Surgery Department en
dc.identifier.eissn 1527-330X en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2015-07-23 en
pubs.dimensions-id 21317117 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics