dc.contributor.author |
Davies, Stephen |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-09-14T21:44:48Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
British Journal of Aesthetics, 2004, 44 (3), pp. 297 - 300 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0007-0904 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/26959 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Berys Gaut has recently defended a cluster account of art. He proposes it as superior to other anti-essentialist positions. I argue that his defense of this claim is unconvincing. Not only is the cluster theory consistent with the current crop of disjunctive definitions, it is at its most plausible when seen in such terms. |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
British Journal of Aesthetics |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/access-purchase/rights-and-permissions/self-archiving-policye.html
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0007-0904/ |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
The cluster theory of art |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1093/aesthj/ayh027 |
en |
pubs.issue |
3 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
297 |
en |
pubs.volume |
44 |
en |
dc.description.version |
AM - Accepted Manuscript |
en |
pubs.end-page |
300 |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
7287 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Arts |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Humanities |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Philosophy |
en |
dc.identifier.eissn |
1468-2842 |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2010-09-01 |
en |