Reducing setup costs: Tooling force prediction in resin transfer moulding (RTM) and compression RTM

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Walbran, WA en
dc.contributor.author Verleye, B en
dc.contributor.author Bickerton, Simon en
dc.contributor.author Kelly, Piaras en
dc.coverage.spatial Troy, Michegan en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-10-19T03:32:26Z en
dc.date.issued 2009 en
dc.identifier.citation 9th Annual Automotive Composites Conference and Exhibition, ACCE, Troy, Michegan, 15 Sep 2009 - 17 Sep 2009. 2009 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/27255 en
dc.description.abstract Mould tools used for Liquid Composite Moulding (LCM) processes such as Resin Transfer Moulding (RTM) and Compression RTM (CRTM) must withstand significant forces generated by the fluid and the fibrous reinforcement. Prediction of these forces will allow for optimizations in setup costs and time, and maximize the usage of the capabilities of peripheral equipment (such as presses). SimLCM is being developed at the University of Auckland as a generic LCM simulation packaged. It has the capability to predict clamping forces and stress distributions acting on mould tools during complete moulding cycles. Both mixed-elastic and viscoelastic reinforcement compaction models are implemented within the package. A series of experiments, both planar (circular flat plate) and non-planar (truncated pyramid), have been undertaken to validate predictions made using SimLCM. Consideration of both the normal and shear components of the fibre preform compaction stress and the internally generated fluid pressure is required for non-planar geometries. This is especially important to extend the capabilities of SimLCM from rigid tool processes (such as RTM and CRTM) to include flexible tool processes such as RTM Light and Vacuum Assisted RTM (VARTM). A friction-based model is used to account for the shear component of compaction stress. In general, predictions for the planar cases are very good, with the viscoelastic model providing significant improvement over the mixed-elastic model during stress relaxation phases. However, for the non-planar cases presented, the peak force is under predicted during preform compaction, and over predicted during the fluid compression phase of CRTM. The under prediction is potentially due to irregularities with the preforms for the non-planar geometry, and is the subject of ongoing research. The over prediction of the force during the fluid compression phase of CRTM is primarily due to internally generated fluid pressure during fluid compression as a result of significant race tracking during the fluid filling phase This is not well-modeled currently by SimLCM and is the subject of ongoing work. en
dc.relation.ispartof 9th Annual Automotive Composites Conference and Exhibition, ACCE en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Reducing setup costs: Tooling force prediction in resin transfer moulding (RTM) and compression RTM en
dc.type Conference Item en
pubs.finish-date 2009-09-17 en
pubs.start-date 2009-09-15 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Proceedings en
pubs.elements-id 150147 en
pubs.org-id Engineering en
pubs.org-id Engineering Science en
pubs.org-id Mechanical Engineering en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2010-12-10 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics