Computer modelling retrospective on Wairakei and Ohaaki

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author O'Sullivan, Michael en
dc.contributor.author Clearwater, Emily en
dc.contributor.author Yeh, Angus en
dc.contributor.author O'Sullivan, John en
dc.contributor.author Shinde, A en
dc.contributor.author Newson, JA en
dc.contributor.author Zarrouk, Sadiq en
dc.contributor.author Mannington, WI en
dc.contributor.editor Horne, RN en
dc.contributor.editor Boyd, T en
dc.coverage.spatial Melbourne, Australia en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-26T02:09:16Z en
dc.date.issued 2015-04-20 en
dc.identifier.citation World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia, 20 Apr 2015 - 24 Apr 2015. Editors: Horne RN, Boyd T. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015. 20 Apr 2015 en
dc.identifier.isbn 1877040029 en
dc.identifier.isbn 9781877040023 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/28106 en
dc.description.abstract Our modelling studies of the Wairakei and Ohaaki geothermal fields have been ongoing for more than 30 years and it is now possible to check back on the predictions made from early studies carried out in the 1990s and early 2000s and determine how well the predictions made by those models compare with reality. There are several problems with a retrospective assessment of the 1990s and early 2000s models. The most significant is that the future scenarios considered then are different from the actual production and injection strategies followed. We overcame this difficulty by using the actual production /injection history with the old models. In general the models perform quite well in matching the production history but in both cases they are too conservative and the actual performance of Wairakei and Ohaaki has been better than that predicted by models from the late 1990s or early 2000s. In both cases the number of make-up wells used in the original future scenarios turned out to be more than have actually been required The main discrepancies arise because of the development of new and/or deeper production zones, not included in the old models. In some cases, e.g. the shallow steam zone at Te Mihi (Wairakei), the permeability has turned out to be even higher than the high value used in the old model and production has continued past the point when the old model predicts failure should occur due to a large pressure decline. en
dc.description.uri http://www.geothermal-energy.org/conferences_and_events/the_world_geothermal_congress/past_wgc_proceedings.html en
dc.publisher International Geothermal Association en
dc.relation.ispartof World Geothermal Congress 2015 en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Computer modelling retrospective on Wairakei and Ohaaki en
dc.type Conference Item en
pubs.author-url https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/WGC/papers/WGC/2015/22030.pdf en
pubs.finish-date 2015-04-24 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
pubs.start-date 2015-04-19 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Proceedings en
pubs.elements-id 486629 en
pubs.org-id Engineering en
pubs.org-id Engineering Science en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2015-04-30 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics