Oral dextrose gel for the treatment of hypoglycaemia in newborn infants

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Weston, PJ en
dc.contributor.author Harris, Deborah en
dc.contributor.author Battin, Malcolm en
dc.contributor.author Brown, Julie en
dc.contributor.author Hegarty, Joanne en
dc.contributor.author Harding, Jane en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-08-26T02:59:01Z en
dc.date.issued 2016-05-04 en
dc.identifier.citation Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016(5) Article number CD011027 04 May 2016 en
dc.identifier.issn 1469-493X en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/30155 en
dc.description.abstract Neonatal hypoglycaemia, a common condition, can be associated with brain injury. It is frequently managed by providing infants with an alternative source of glucose, given enterally with formula or intravenously with dextrose solution. This often requires that mother and baby are cared for in separate environments and may inhibit breast feeding. Dextrose gel is simple and inexpensive and can be administered directly to the buccal mucosa for rapid correction of hypoglycaemia, in association with continued breast feeding and maternal care.To assess the effectiveness of dextrose gel in correcting hypoglycaemia and in reducing long-term neurodevelopmental impairment.We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Web of Science from inception of the database to February 2016. We also searched international clinical trials networks and handsearched proceedings of specific scientific meetings.Randomised and quasi-randomised studies comparing dextrose gel versus placebo, no treatment or other therapies for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data and did not assess publications for which they themselves were study authors.We included two trials involving 312 infants. No data were available for correction of hypoglycaemia for each hypoglycaemic event. We found no evidence of a difference between dextrose gel and placebo gel for major neurosensory disability at two-year follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 6.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 51.03; one trial, n = 184; quality of evidence very low). Dextrose gel compared with placebo gel or no gel did not alter the need for intravenous treatment for hypoglycaemia (typical RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.32; two trials, 312 infants; quality of evidence very low). Infants treated with dextrose gel were less likely to be separated from their mothers for treatment of hypoglycaemia (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.93; one trial, 237 infants; quality of evidence moderate) and were more likely to be exclusively breast fed after discharge (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18; one trial, 237 infants; quality of evidence moderate). Estimated rise in blood glucose concentration following dextrose gel was 0.4 mmol/L (95% CI -0.14 to 0.94; one trial, 75 infants). Investigators in one trial reported no adverse outcomes (n = 237 infants).Treatment of infants with neonatal hypoglycaemia with 40% dextrose gel reduces the incidence of mother-infant separation for treatment and increases the likelihood of full breast feeding after discharge compared with placebo gel. No evidence suggests occurrence of adverse effects during the neonatal period or at two years' corrected age. Oral dextrose gel should be considered first-line treatment for infants with neonatal hypoglycaemia. en
dc.publisher Cochrane Collaboration en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1469-493X/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Oral dextrose gel for the treatment of hypoglycaemia in newborn infants en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/14651858.CD011027.pub2 en
pubs.issue 5 en
pubs.volume 2016 en
dc.description.version VoR - Version of Record en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Cochrane Collaboration en
dc.identifier.pmid 27142842 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Review en
pubs.elements-id 538330 en
pubs.org-id Liggins Institute en
pubs.org-id LiFePATH en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Obstetrics and Gynaecology en
pubs.number CD011027 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2016-05-05 en
pubs.dimensions-id 27142842 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics