Guidelines, process and ethics with the New Zealand Mental Health (compulsory assessment and treatment) Act: striking a balance

ResearchSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gale, Christopher en
dc.contributor.author Mullen, Richard en
dc.contributor.author Shue, Lily en
dc.date.accessioned 2008-09-25T03:05:06Z en
dc.date.available 2008-09-25T03:05:06Z en
dc.date.issued 2007 en
dc.identifier.citation BMC Psychiatry 7(Suppl 1), S102. (2007) en
dc.identifier.issn 1471-244X en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/3022 en
dc.description Conference details: WPA Thematic Conference. Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Review Dresden, Germany. 6–8 June 2007. An open access copy of this article is available and complies with the copyright holder/publisher conditions. en
dc.description.abstract The New Zealand Mental Health (compulsory assessment and treatment) act [1] was amended to mandate the consultation of family and care-givers in every stage of civil committal. Although the use of committal has been seen by clinicians as an impediment to care [2] and clinicians continue to have concerns about the timing of discharge from the act [3], many people with serious mental illness have experienced the act as beneficial [4]. A recent review of the regulations has increased the length and detail of the reports clinicians have to provide to the court. This, combined with a clear directive that an advocate who is not part of the clinical care process must be present during the clinical interview to commence committal, may be causing a conflict between the provision of care in a timely manner when patients are at risk and complying with the requirements of the court. en
dc.publisher BioMed Central Ltd. en
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC Psychiatry en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Guidelines, process and ethics with the New Zealand Mental Health (compulsory assessment and treatment) Act: striking a balance en
dc.type Conference Item en
dc.subject.marsden Fields of Research::320000 Medical and Health Sciences en
dc.description.version VoR - Version of Record en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: the author en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics