The effect of a simulation-based training intervention on the performance of established critical care unit teams

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Frengley, RW en
dc.contributor.author Weller, J en
dc.contributor.author Weller, Jennifer en
dc.contributor.author Torrie, Jocelyn en
dc.contributor.author Dzendrowskyj, P en
dc.contributor.author Yee, B en
dc.contributor.author Paul, AM en
dc.contributor.author Shulruf, Boaz en
dc.contributor.author Henderson, KM en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-09-16T03:36:22Z en
dc.date.issued 2011-12 en
dc.identifier.citation Critical Care Medicine 39(12):2605-2611 Dec 2011 en
dc.identifier.issn 0090-3493 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/30383 en
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effectiveness of a simulation-based intervention on improving teamwork in multidisciplinary critical care teams managing airway and cardiac crises and compared simulation-based learning and case-based learning on scores for performance. DESIGN: Self-controlled randomized crossover study design with blinded assessors. SETTING: A simulated critical care ward, using a high-fidelity patient simulator, in a university simulation center. SUBJECTS: Forty teams from critical care units within the region comprising one doctor and three nurses. INTERVENTION: At the beginning and end of the 10-hr study day, each team undertook two preintervention and two postintervention assessment simulations (one airway, one cardiac on both occasions). The study day included presentations and discussions on human factors and crisis management, and airway and cardiac skills stations. For the intervention, teams were randomized to case-based learning or simulation-based learning for cardiac or airway scenarios. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each simulation was recorded and independently rated by three blinded expert assessors using a structured rating tool with technical and behavioral components. Participants were surveyed 3 months later. We demonstrated significant improvements in scores for overall teamwork (p ≤ .002) and the two behavioral factors, "Leadership and Team Coordination" (p ≤ .002) and "Verbalizing Situational Information" (p ≤ .02). Scores for clinical management also improved significantly (p ≤ .003). We found no significant difference between simulation-based learning and case-based learning in the context of this study. Survey data supported the effectiveness of study day with responders reporting retention of learning and changes made to patient management. CONCLUSIONS: A simulation-based study day can improve teamwork in multidisciplinary critical care unit teams as measured in pre- and postcourse simulations with some evidence of subsequent changes to patient management. In the context of a full-day course, using a mix of simulation-based learning and case-based learnings seems to be an effective teaching strategy. en
dc.publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Critical Care Medicine en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title The effect of a simulation-based training intervention on the performance of established critical care unit teams en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a98 en
pubs.issue 12 en
pubs.begin-page 2605 en
pubs.volume 39 en
dc.identifier.pmid 21765354 en
pubs.end-page 2611 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 258477 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Anaesthesiology en
pubs.org-id Cent Medical & Hlth Sci Educat en
dc.identifier.eissn 1530-0293 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2012-03-08 en
pubs.dimensions-id 21765354 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics