Analyses of problem-solving and decision-making in complex and dynamic environments.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Hughes, B en
dc.contributor.author Wright-Taylor, Catherine en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-09-20T02:45:15Z en
dc.date.issued 2016 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/30427 en
dc.description Full text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.description.abstract Decision-making has previously been described as more complex under situations involving time pressure, ambiguity and in situations which are constantly changing (dynamic). The current study aimed to examine decision-making complexity and its relation to decision-making type and expertise in a population of Ambulance Officers and Fire Fighters. The research involved semi-structured interviews, based on the Cognitive Interview, and evaluated several hypotheses: (1) decision-making complexity will comprise at least four factors (time pressure, number of factors to consider in decision-making ‘space’, ambiguity and whether the decision-making space is dynamic); (2) the dimensions of complexity will differ across the two emergency services; (3) rank will have an impact of decision-making complexity, whereby experts will be less affected by complexity; (4) decision-making style (intuitively subconscious vs conscious and rational) used by participants will be impacted by rank. The current study found evidence for two dimensions of decision-making complexity– time pressure and ambiguity. Few differences in the dimensions of decision-making complexity seen across the two emergency services. However, differences were seen across ranks in the services: novices reported more examples of ambiguity than experts, and novices reported fewer strategies for dealing with time pressure. Experts tended to report making intuitive judgements more than their novice counterparts. The decision-making type used by Emergency Responder was dependent on the context in which the decision was made. The study concluded that complex decision-making in emergency responding work has two important dimensions – ambiguity and time pressure. The study also concluded that context determines the appropriateness of the decision-making type. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA99264877208102091 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights Restricted Item. Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title Analyses of problem-solving and decision-making in complex and dynamic environments. en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Psychology en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Masters en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.elements-id 541504 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2016-09-20 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics