Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness for discriminating primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma using optical coherence tomography

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Khanal, Safal en
dc.contributor.author Davey, PG en
dc.contributor.author Racette, L en
dc.contributor.author Thapa, M en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-11-04T02:18:56Z en
dc.date.issued 2016-07 en
dc.identifier.citation Clinical and Experimental Optometry 99(4):373-381 Jul 2016 en
dc.identifier.issn 0816-4622 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/30963 en
dc.description.abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the discrimination capabilities of macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness parameters as measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). Methods: A total of 90 subjects were enrolled: 30 healthy subjects, 30 subjects with POAG and 30 subjects with NTG, consecutively. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, macular thickness and volume measurements were obtained with circular and radial SD-OCT scans. All parameters were compared between groups using an analysis of variance test. Areas under receiver-operating characteristic (AROC) curves with sensitivities at specificities greater than or equal to 90 per cent were generated to compare discrimination capabilities of various parameters between POAG and NTG. Results: Macular thickness and volume measurements were the highest in normal subjects, followed by NTG and POAG (p < 0.05). Average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness had perfect discrimination for normal-POAG (AROC: 1.000; sensitivity: 100 per cent) and near perfect discrimination for normal-NTG (AROC: 0.979; sensitivity: 93 per cent) as well as NTG-POAG pairs (AROC: 0.900; sensitivity: 60 per cent). Inferior outer macular thickness (IOMT) and total volume were the best macular thickness and volume parameters having similar AROCs and sensitivities between normal and POAG (IOMT, AROC: 0.987; sensitivity: 92 per cent and total volume, AROC: 0.997; sensitivity: 97 per cent), normal and NTG (IOMT, AROC: 0.862, sensitivity: 47 per cent and total volume, AROC: 0.898, sensitivity: 67 per cent) and also between NTG and POAG (IOMT, AROC: 0.910, sensitivity: 53 per cent and total volume, AROC: 0.922, sensitivity: 77 per cent). In each comparison group, there was no statistically significant difference in AROCs between average retinal nerve fiber layer and inferior outer macular thickness, as well as total volume. Conclusions: The macular parameters offer comparable performance to pRNFL parameters for the discrimination of NTG and POAG. Average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, total macular volume and inferior outer macular thickness were the best SD-OCT parameters with superior discriminating capabilities. en
dc.publisher Wiley en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Clinical and Experimental Optometry en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness for discriminating primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma using optical coherence tomography en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/cxo.12366 en
pubs.issue 4 en
pubs.begin-page 373 en
pubs.volume 99 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Wiley en
pubs.end-page 381 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 525355 en
pubs.org-id Academic Services en
pubs.org-id Examinations en
dc.identifier.eissn 1444-0938 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2016-03-24 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics