A comparison between wavelet based static and dynamic neural network approaches for runoff prediction

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shoaib, Muhammad en
dc.contributor.author Shamseldin, Asaad en
dc.contributor.author Melville, Bruce en
dc.contributor.author Khan, MM en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-02T21:07:39Z en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-11-28T22:47:18Z en
dc.date.issued 2016-04 en
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 535 pp. 211 - 225 en
dc.identifier.issn 0022-1694 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/31169 en
dc.description.abstract In order to predict runoff accurately from a rainfall event, the multilayer perceptron type of neural network models are commonly used in hydrology. Furthermore, the wavelet coupled multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) models has also been found superior relative to the simple neural network models which are not coupled with wavelet. However, the MLPNN models are considered as static and memory less networks and lack the ability to examine the temporal dimension of data. Recurrent neural network models, on the other hand, have the ability to learn from the preceding conditions of the system and hence considered as dynamic models. This study for the first time explores the potential of wavelet coupled time lagged recurrent neural network (TLRNN) models for runoff prediction using rainfall data. The Discrete Wavelet Transformation (DWT) is employed in this study to decompose the input rainfall data using six of the most commonly used wavelet functions. The performance of the simple and the wavelet coupled static MLPNN models is compared with their counterpart dynamic TLRNN models. The study found that the dynamic wavelet coupled TLRNN models can be considered as alternative to the static wavelet MLPNN models. The study also investigated the effect of memory depth on the performance of static and dynamic neural network models. The memory depth refers to how much past information (lagged data) is required as it is not known a priori. The db8 wavelet function is found to yield the best results with the static MLPNN models and with the TLRNN models having small memory depths. The performance of the wavelet coupled TLRNN models with large memory depths is found insensitive to the selection of the wavelet function as all wavelet functions have similar performance. en
dc.description.uri https://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-hydrology/0022-1694/open-access-options en
dc.publisher Elsevier en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Hydrology en
dc.relation.replaces http://hdl.handle.net/2292/28357 en
dc.relation.replaces 2292/28357 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0022-1694/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en
dc.title A comparison between wavelet based static and dynamic neural network approaches for runoff prediction en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.076 en
pubs.begin-page 211 en
pubs.volume 535 en
dc.description.version AM - Accepted Manuscript en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Elsevier en
pubs.author-url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169416300166 en
pubs.end-page 225 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 523065 en
pubs.org-id Engineering en
pubs.org-id Civil and Environmental Eng en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2016-03-03 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics