Validating an antimicrobial technology for the advanced wound care market

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Brookes, R en
dc.contributor.advisor Henry, S en
dc.contributor.author Mathias, Raisa en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-12-11T20:29:55Z en
dc.date.issued 2016 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/31311 en
dc.description Full text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.description.abstract Small firms often have a reputation to be radically innovative although many lack the resources to develop their products independently. Opening up their innovation process is one way that they can successfully introduce a product to the market. Plenty of research has been carried out to help larger companies identify firms whose innovation they could capitalize on. However, the literature is lacking for the opposite situation, in which firms seek the most suitable companies to share their knowledge with. One of the problems encountered by firms developing a potentially radical innovation is the uncertainty about what the technology will be used for. Before they can open up their innovation process, they need to identify the potential market they want to enter. A market validation of the technology with the proposed end users is often useful in order to find out the factors that influence product adoption. This was undertaken in the present study for a small biotechnology firm, Kode Biotech, which is developing a novel antimicrobial technology. This was done by using a qualitative approach; interviewing health professionals. The findings of the study show that there are 5 factors that influence the adoption decision of health care professionals for wound care products – the product’s attributes, the perceived cost of the product, evidence that the product is effective, organisational & environmental factors, and individual user characteristics. Additionally, there are conflicts between these factors because wound care is context specific and the importance of each factor differs according to the specific situation. This might be resolved by Kode developing a more focussed value proposition for its product. Furthermore, this research found that there are many wound care companies that Kode could partner with. In particular, there are 4 companies that they should focus on because the Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC) supplies their products to hospitals and the healthcare professionals interviewed are already aware of them. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA99264896503702091 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights Restricted Item. Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title Validating an antimicrobial technology for the advanced wound care market en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Bioscience Enterprise en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Masters en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.elements-id 552357 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2016-12-12 en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112925950


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics