Retrospective risk assessment reveals likelihood of potential non-target attack and parasitism by Cotesia urabae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): A comparison between laboratory and field-cage testing results

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Avila, GA en
dc.contributor.author Withers, TM en
dc.contributor.author Holwell, Gregory en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-12T04:00:44Z en
dc.date.available 2016-08-16 en
dc.date.issued 2016-12 en
dc.identifier.citation Biological Control, December 2016, 103, 108 - 118 en
dc.identifier.issn 1049-9644 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/31575 en
dc.description.abstract We conducted retrospective non-target risk assessment with the larval endoparasitoid Cotesia urabae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), via sequential no-choice tests, to assess the potential risk posed to two New Zealand endemic species: the magpie moth, Nyctemera annulata (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), and the common forest looper Pseudocoremia suavis (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), as well as to the beneficial biological control agent, the cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae (Lepidoptera: Erebidae). Under no-choice laboratory conditions C. urabae did oviposit in T. jacobaeae and N. annulata, and parasitism was confirmed upon dissection of both species at a rate similar to the target host, Uraba lugens (Lepidoptera: Nolidae). Mean attack frequency differed significantly between the three non-targets tested and the target host, where only N. annulata and T. jacobaeae were found to be attacked at a similar rate to the target host U. lugens. However, time to attack was significantly faster against the target host than the non-targets. When oviposition-experienced and naïve C. urabae females were compared, both showed similar mean attack frequencies but experienced parasitoids showed a shorter mean time to attack than naïve parasitoids. Parasitism of N. annulata under semi-natural field conditions was also investigated in field cages. Dissections of N. annulata larvae from field-cages revealed significant differences in mean parasitism between the choice cage, and the non-target no-choice cage treatments. In both cases mean parasitism of N. annulata was significantly lower than on the target host U. lugens. Results of the field-cage assay in particular, suggest that non-target impacts of C. urabae on N. annulata in the field are likely to be limited. Whether the non-target impacts predicted will be of ecological significance to the species population dynamics remains to be ascertained. en
dc.language English en
dc.publisher Elsevier en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Biological Control en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1049-9644/ https://www.elsevier.com/about/company-information/policies/sharing en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Retrospective risk assessment reveals likelihood of potential non-target attack and parasitism by Cotesia urabae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): A comparison between laboratory and field-cage testing results en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.08.008 en
pubs.begin-page 108 en
pubs.volume 103 en
dc.description.version VoR - Version of Record en
pubs.author-url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964416301517 en
pubs.end-page 118 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 540897 en
pubs.org-id Science en
pubs.org-id Biological Sciences en
dc.identifier.eissn 1090-2112 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-01-12 en
pubs.online-publication-date 2016-08-24 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics