Sound in motion: good vibrations? characterising the hearing in different decapod crustacean species

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Radford, C en
dc.contributor.author Tay, Kevin en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-02T21:26:42Z en
dc.date.issued 2016 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/31719 en
dc.description Full text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.description.abstract Ambient underwater sound is a prominent feature of marine environments that is comprised of a variety of abiotic, biotic and anthropogenic sources. Many marine organisms, including crustaceans, rely on underwater sound for a number of important life strategies. Sound comprises of two components, particle motion and sound pressure, with crustaceans being most sensitive to the particle motion component. In decapod crustacean species, the statocyst has previously been identified as an organ that plays a crucial role in detecting particle motion. This study characterised and compared the hearing of five different decapod crustaceans from different habitats, using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Comparisons were made between the traditional AEP (dual-source, speaker) technique and the shaker table AEP (particle motion only) technique to determine the respective contributions of the two sound components to crustacean hearing. In order to study the importance of the statocyst to crustacean hearing, statocyst structures in paddle crabs were crushed after normal recordings were carried out using both methods. Experiments were repeated and showed that evoked responses disappeared after statocyst structures were crushed, which is indicative of their prominent role of sound detection in crustaceans. Overall, differences were found between species from different habitats (rocky shore vs soft sediment), with snapping shrimp and purple shore crab showing the most and least sensitive hearing respectively when tested using dual-source stimuli. In contrast, the sensitivity and frequency bandwidths between the five species were similar when tested using pure particle motion stimuli. These differences observed between species may be attributed to species-specific differences in life history or statocyst morphology and presence of unknown ancillary hearing structures, all of which might aid with achieving higher frequency sound detection. In conclusion, the results from this study provide the first comparison of the hearing abilities of marine temperate crustacean species and have greatly improved our general understanding of the hearing capabilities of these animals. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA99264899413602091 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights Restricted Item. Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title Sound in motion: good vibrations? characterising the hearing in different decapod crustacean species en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Marine Sciences en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Masters en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.elements-id 611552 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-02-03 en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112926615


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics