Proactive Modulation of Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition during Response Inhibition

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cowie, Matthew en
dc.contributor.author MacDonald, HJ en
dc.contributor.author Cirillo, John en
dc.contributor.author Byblow, Winston en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-28T03:36:11Z en
dc.date.issued 2016-08-01 en
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Neurophysiology 16(2):859-867 01 Aug 2016 en
dc.identifier.issn 0022-3077 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/32006 en
dc.description.abstract Daily activities often require sudden cancellation of pre-planned movement, termed response inhibition. When only a subcomponent of a whole response must be suppressed (required herein on Partial trials), the ensuing component is markedly delayed. The neural mechanisms underlying partial response inhibition remain unclear. We hypothesized that Partial trials would be associated with non-selective corticomotor suppression and that GABAB-receptor mediated inhibition within primary motor cortex might be responsible for the non-selective corticomotor suppression contributing to Partial trial response delays. Sixteen right-handed participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition task while single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to elicit motor evoked potentials in the left first dorsal interosseous muscle. Lift times, amplitude of motor evoked potentials and long-interval intracortical inhibition were examined across the different trial types (Go, Stop-Left, Stop-Right, Stop-Both). Go trials produced a tight distribution of lift times around the target, whereas those during Partial trials (Stop-Left and Stop-Right) were substantially delayed. The modulation of motor evoked potential amplitude during Stop-Right trials reflected anticipation, suppression and subsequent re-initiation of movement. Importantly, suppression was present across all Stop trial types, indicative of a "default" non-selective inhibitory process. Compared with blocks containing only Go trials, inhibition increased when Stop trials were introduced but did not differ between trial types. The amount of inhibition was positively correlated with lift times during Stop-Right trials. Tonic levels of inhibition appear to be proactively modulated by task context and influence the speed at which unimanual responses occur after a non-selective "brake" is applied. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.publisher American Physiological Society en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Neurophysiology en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0022-3077/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Proactive Modulation of Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition during Response Inhibition en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1152/jn.00144.2016 en
pubs.issue 2 en
pubs.begin-page 859 en
pubs.volume 16 en
dc.description.version AM - Accepted Manuscript en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: American Physiological Society en
dc.identifier.pmid 27281744 en
pubs.end-page 867 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 531288 en
pubs.org-id Science en
pubs.org-id Exercise Sciences en
dc.identifier.eissn 1522-1598 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-02-28 en
pubs.online-publication-date 2016-06-08 en
pubs.dimensions-id 27281744 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics