Pressures on a cubic building-Part 1: Full-scale results

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Richards, Peter en
dc.contributor.author Hoxey, RP en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-13T03:48:59Z en
dc.date.issued 2012-03 en
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, March 2012, 102, 72 - 86 en
dc.identifier.issn 0167-6105 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/32161 en
dc.description.abstract Pressures on the vertical and horizontal centrelines of the Silsoe 6m cube are presented. The full-scale data has been processed in 12. min non-overlapping record blocks of cube surface tap pressure together with the reference upstream approach flow measured at cube height. Since in full-scale one has to accept the wind conditions provided by nature, each block of data is unique in regards to even the mean conditions and there is no opportunity to exactly replicate a test multiple times, as might be done in a wind tunnel. As a result the data are processed in a manner that makes use of the large number of blocks recorded. Pressure coefficients are determined by normalising with the wind dynamic pressure at the reference position. The mean, standard deviation, maximum and minimum pressure coefficients are determined by normalising the measured pressures by the mean, standard deviation and maximum wind dynamic pressure, respectively. It is concluded that using this normalising process helps to minimise the uncertainty of the results. A least squares optimisation method is used to fit a truncated Fourier series to the pressure coefficient data over the 360° of flow direction. The differences between the data points and the fitted curves are used to assess the uncertainty associated with each type of coefficient. It is shown that typically 90% of the normalised data lies within a band of ±0.1 for the mean pressure coefficient and ±18% for the standard deviation coefficient. However with the maximum and minimum pressure coefficients the uncertainty is higher and asymmetric, and is best modelled as a combination of a fixed amount plus a percentage of the coefficient. The highest uncertainty noted was for the minimum coefficient where 90% of the data lies between about +0.1-16% of the coefficient and -0.1+25% of the coefficient. It is shown that all of the pressure coefficients determined form a consistent set, which exhibit sensible variations with both position and wind direction. It is believed that this set of data offers opportunities for the assessment of wind tunnel and CFD models, which has not been previously possible. en
dc.language English en
dc.publisher Elsevier en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0167-6105/ https://www.elsevier.com/about/company-information/policies/sharing en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Pressures on a cubic building-Part 1: Full-scale results en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.11.004 en
pubs.begin-page 72 en
pubs.volume 102 en
dc.description.version VoR - Version of Record en
pubs.author-url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610511002339 en
pubs.end-page 86 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 326054 en
dc.identifier.eissn 1872-8197 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-03-13 en
pubs.online-publication-date 2011-12-21 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics