dc.contributor.author |
Hall, Kristy Louise |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2008-12-11T02:41:15Z |
en |
dc.date.available |
2008-12-11T02:41:15Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
en |
dc.identifier |
THESIS 05-061 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/3246 |
en |
dc.description |
Restricted Item. Print thesis available in the University of Auckland Library or may be available through Interlibrary Loan. |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Bioprospecting is not the conservation and development panacea envisaged at the
beginning of the last decade. Following the development of modern biotechnologies,
native plants, animals, fungi, and microorganisms were viewed as potentially lucrative
resources. Paradoxically, developing countries, which possess the majority of the
world's biodiversity, rarely have the technological capacity to harness it. They
therefore must enter into research collaborations that rarely repatriate the economic,
social, or environmental benefits that they desire. For this reason, bioprospecting will
always favour developed countries such as New Zealand and Australia that possess both
biodiversity and the biotechnological capacity to profit from it. Bioprospecting can
therefore be considered as "green developmentalism"; a mechanism that reinforces
existing inequities whilst endorsing the appropriation and commodification of resources
under the guise of environmental policy. Following the development of access and
benefit sharing policies by a number of other countries, the New Zealand government
has undertaken a review of bioprospecting policy. Through the analysis of public
submissions and existing research, complemented by interviews and a telephone survey,
this thesis aims to contribute to this process to more effectively govern bioprospecting
in New Zealand. Stakeholders reveal a concern for international involvement and the
overharvesting of species. Tangata whenua also state that the development of
bioprospecting policy should not prejudice the Wai 262 claim over flora and fauna that
is currently being heard by the Waitangi Tribunal. Pending the outcome of the claim, it
is recommended that existing permit systems governing access to native species be
amended to include requirements for benefit sharing. Flexible requirements for
repatriating benefits should be accompanied by the provision of enforcement
mechanisms. It is also recommended that the New Zealand government observe the
implementation of the Australian Nationally Consistent Approach to observe the
effectiveness of policy in practice. It is concluded that in order to facilitate
bioprospecting, there needs to be consideration of the commercial realities of the
industry. |
en |
dc.publisher |
ResearchSpace@Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.isreferencedby |
UoA1473019 |
en |
dc.rights |
Restricted Item. Print thesis available in the University of Auckland Library or may be available through Interlibrary Loan. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
Bioprospecting ... or biopiracy? : access to biological diversity and benefit sharing in the New Zealand context |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
thesis.degree.grantor |
The University of Auckland |
en |
thesis.degree.level |
Masters |
en |
dc.subject.marsden |
Fields of Research::300000 Agricultural, Veterinary and Environmental Sciences::300800 Environmental Science |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/ClosedAccess |
en |
dc.identifier.wikidata |
Q112859794 |
|