The Simpson's paradox and fMRI: Similarities and differences between functional connectivity measures derived from within-subject and across-subject correlations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Roberts, Reece en
dc.contributor.author Hach, Sylvia en
dc.contributor.author Tippett, Lynette en
dc.contributor.author Addis, Donna Rose en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-07T21:26:45Z en
dc.date.issued 2016-07 en
dc.identifier.issn 1053-8119 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/32790 en
dc.description.abstract Task-related functional connectivity (fc-MRI) indexes the interaction of brain regions during cognitive tasks. Two general classes of methods exist to investigate fc-MRI: the most widely-used method calculates temporal correlations between voxels/regions within subjects, and then determines if within-subject correlations are reliable across subjects (ws-fcMRI); the other calculates the average (BOLD) signal within voxels/regions and then performs correlations across subjects (as-fcMRI). That is, while both methods rely on correlational techniques, the level at which correlations are calculated is fundamentally different. While conceptually distinct, it is not known how well these two methods of fc-MRI analyses converge on the same findings. The current study addresses this question across a number of analyses. First, using default-mode network regions as seeds, we show that as-fcMRI does not strongly predict ws-fcMRI during episodic simulation tasks. Next, we show that the relationship between as-fcMRI and ws-fcMRI is contingent on whether correlations are calculated between regions from the same functional network (default mode or dorsal attention networks) or between regions from different functional networks. Lastly, we compare seed partial least squares (PLS) - a well-established as-fcMRI method - with a novel version of seed PLS that combines the multivariate approach of PLS analyses and within-subject correlations. The results showed that while many regions exhibited congruent as-fcMRI and ws-fcMRI effects, in some regions the two analyses produced effects in opposite directions. Results are discussed in relation to the Simpson's Paradox, a phenomenon in which across-subject correlations are reversed within individuals present in a sample. Overall, our results suggest that the findings of as-fcMRI do not always map onto those from ws-fcMRI. We end by discussing the advantages associated with using ws-fcMRI to assess the task-related interactions between brain regions. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.publisher Academic Press en
dc.relation.ispartofseries NeuroImage en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title The Simpson's paradox and fMRI: Similarities and differences between functional connectivity measures derived from within-subject and across-subject correlations en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.028 en
pubs.begin-page 1 en
pubs.volume 135 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Elsevier en
dc.identifier.pmid 27101735 en
pubs.end-page 15 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 526962 en
pubs.org-id Science en
pubs.org-id Psychology en
dc.identifier.eissn 1095-9572 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-02-06 en
pubs.dimensions-id 27101735 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics