The Views of Informal Carers' Evaluation of Services (VOICES): Toward an adaptation for the New Zealand bicultural context

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Frey, Rosemary en
dc.contributor.author Williams, Lisa en
dc.contributor.author Trussardi, G en
dc.contributor.author Black, Stella en
dc.contributor.author Robinson, Jacqualine en
dc.contributor.author Moeke-Maxwell, Tess en
dc.contributor.author Gott, Caryl en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-06-06T00:16:12Z en
dc.date.issued 2017-02 en
dc.identifier.citation Palliative and Supportive Care 15(1):67-76 Feb 2017 en
dc.identifier.issn 1478-9515 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/33280 en
dc.description.abstract The Views of Informal Carers Experiences of Services (VOICES) instrument is a postal questionnaire that has been utilized internationally to capture the experiences of end-of-life care during the last months of life. Aotearoa/New Zealand, traditionally a bicultural society, reflects both the European worldview and that of the indigenous Māori. The Māori collectivist worldview considers whānau (extended family) support as key at the end of life and privileges "kanohi ki te kanohi" (face-to-face) meetings. In such a context, how will VOICES be received? Our pilot study was designed to test the effectiveness of an adaptation of the VOICES questionnaire in the New Zealand social setting for both Māori and non-Māori.Cognitive interviews were conducted with 20 bereaved whānau and family members whose relative died between January 1 and April 4, 2014, in one urban New Zealand hospital. Thematic analysis was conducted on the resulting transcripts.We found that, although the questionnaire provides valuable information, administration of the current questionnaire within a bicultural context is problematic. These problems are related to its scope, cultural acceptability, structure, and content. Distribution of the VOICES questionnaire, either through the post or online, without prior consultation, also risks engaging Māori in a culturally inappropriate manner.These findings will prompt revisions to both the content and research approach to implementing VOICES in a bicultural context. Recommendations include prior consultation with local indigenous communities as well as utilization of a mixed-methods approach to utilizing VOICES in a bicultural context. The cognitive interview procedures employed (adjusted for a collectivist worldview) in this study may also prove useful to indigenous groups seeking to develop or adapt questionnaires within a bicultural or multicultural context. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Palliative and Supportive Care en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title The Views of Informal Carers' Evaluation of Services (VOICES): Toward an adaptation for the New Zealand bicultural context en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1017/s1478951516000146 en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 67 en
pubs.volume 15 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Cambridge University Press en
dc.identifier.pmid 27063437 en
pubs.end-page 76 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 526129 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Nursing en
dc.identifier.eissn 1478-9523 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-06-06 en
pubs.dimensions-id 27063437 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics