Standardising the lactulose mannitol test of gut permeability to minimise error and promote comparability

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sequeira, Ivana en
dc.contributor.author Lentle, RG en
dc.contributor.author Kruger, MC en
dc.contributor.author Hurst, RD en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-06-28T04:33:34Z en
dc.date.available 2014-05-13 en
dc.date.issued 2014-06-05 en
dc.identifier.citation PLoS ONE, 5 June 2014, 9 (6), Article number e99256 en
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/33821 en
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Lactulose mannitol ratio tests are clinically useful for assessing disorders characterised by changes in gut permeability and for assessing mixing in the intestinal lumen. Variations between currently used test protocols preclude meaningful comparisons between studies. We determined the optimal sampling period and related this to intestinal residence. METHODS: Half-hourly lactulose and mannitol urinary excretions were determined over 6 hours in 40 healthy female volunteers after administration of either 600 mg aspirin or placebo, in randomised order at weekly intervals. Gastric and small intestinal transit times were assessed by the SmartPill in 6 subjects from the same population. Half-hourly percentage recoveries of lactulose and mannitol were grouped on a basis of compartment transit time. The rate of increase or decrease of each sugar within each group was explored by simple linear regression to assess the optimal period of sampling. KEY RESULTS: The between subject standard errors for each half-hourly lactulose and mannitol excretion were lowest, the correlation of the quantity of each sugar excreted with time was optimal and the difference between the two sugars in this temporal relationship maximal during the period from 2½-4 h after ingestion. Half-hourly lactulose excretions were generally increased after dosage with aspirin whilst those of mannitol were unchanged as was the temporal pattern and period of lowest between subject standard error for both sugars. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that between subject variation in the percentage excretion of the two sugars would be minimised and the differences in the temporal patterns of excretion would be maximised if the period of collection of urine used in clinical tests of small intestinal permeability were restricted to 2½-4 h post dosage. This period corresponds to a period when the column of digesta column containing the probes is passing from the small to the large intestine. en
dc.description.uri https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047110/ en
dc.format.medium Electronic-eCollection en
dc.language English en
dc.publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS) en
dc.relation.ispartofseries PLoS ONE en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1932-6203/ https://www.plos.org/open-access/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ en
dc.subject Intestine, Small en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Mannitol en
dc.subject Aspirin en
dc.subject Lactulose en
dc.subject Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal en
dc.subject Gastrointestinal Transit en
dc.subject Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid en
dc.subject Placebo Effect en
dc.subject Permeability en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Healthy Volunteers en
dc.title Standardising the lactulose mannitol test of gut permeability to minimise error and promote comparability en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0099256 en
pubs.issue 6 en
pubs.volume 9 en
dc.identifier.pmid 24901524 en
pubs.author-url http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099256 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 537875 en
pubs.org-id Science en
pubs.org-id Biological Sciences en
dc.identifier.eissn 1932-6203 en
pubs.number e99256 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-06-28 en
pubs.dimensions-id 24901524 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics