Influenza vaccine effectiveness for hospital and community patients using control groups with and without non-influenza respiratory viruses detected, Auckland, New Zealand 2014

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pierse, N en
dc.contributor.author Kelly, H en
dc.contributor.author Thompson, MG en
dc.contributor.author Bissielo, A en
dc.contributor.author Radke, S en
dc.contributor.author Huang, QS en
dc.contributor.author Baker, MG en
dc.contributor.author Turner, Nicola en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-08-11T00:11:12Z en
dc.date.issued 2016-01 en
dc.identifier.citation Vaccine 34(4):503-509 Jan 2016 en
dc.identifier.issn 0264-410X en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/35016 en
dc.description.abstract We aimed to estimate the protection afforded by inactivated influenza vaccine, in both community and hospital settings, in a well characterised urban population in Auckland during 2014.We used two different comparison groups, all patients who tested negative for influenza and only those patients who tested negative for influenza and had a non-influenza respiratory virus detected, to calculate the vaccine effectiveness in a test negative study design. Estimates were made separately for general practice outpatient consultations and hospitalised patients, stratified by age group and by influenza type and subtype. Vaccine status was confirmed by electronic record for general practice patients and all respiratory viruses were detected by real time polymerase chain reaction.1039 hospitalised and 1154 general practice outpatient consultations met all the study inclusion criteria and had a respiratory sample tested for influenza and other respiratory viruses. Compared to general practice patients, hospitalised patients were more likely to be very young or very old, to be Māori or Pacific Islander, to have a low income and to suffer from chronic disease. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) adjusted for age and other participant characteristics using all influenza negative controls was 42% (95% CI: 16 to 60%) for hospitalised and 56% (95% CI: 35 to 70%) for general practice patients. The vaccine appeared to be most effective against the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 strain with an adjusted VE of 62% (95% CI:38 to 77%) for hospitalised and 59% (95% CI:36 to 74%) for general practice patients, using influenza virus negative controls. Similar results found when patients testing positive for a non-influenza respiratory virus were used as the control group.This study contributes to validation of the test negative design and confirms that inactivated influenza vaccines continue to provide modest but significant protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.publisher Elsevier BV en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Vaccine en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject SHIVERS investigation team en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Respiratory Tract Diseases en
dc.subject Vaccines, Inactivated en
dc.subject Influenza Vaccines en
dc.subject Vaccination en
dc.subject Hospitalization en
dc.subject Sentinel Surveillance en
dc.subject Control Groups en
dc.subject Adolescent en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Aged en
dc.subject Aged, 80 and over en
dc.subject Middle Aged en
dc.subject Child en
dc.subject Child, Preschool en
dc.subject Infant en
dc.subject New Zealand en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Male en
dc.subject Influenza, Human en
dc.subject Young Adult en
dc.subject General Practice en
dc.title Influenza vaccine effectiveness for hospital and community patients using control groups with and without non-influenza respiratory viruses detected, Auckland, New Zealand 2014 en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.073 en
pubs.issue 4 en
pubs.begin-page 503 en
pubs.volume 34 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Elsevier BV en
dc.identifier.pmid 26685091 en
pubs.end-page 509 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 518188 en
dc.identifier.eissn 1873-2518 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-08-11 en
pubs.dimensions-id 26685091 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics