dc.contributor.author |
Elliffe, Craig |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Barrow, Jane |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-08-24T04:13:24Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2017-06 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Taxation Today 4-7 Jun 2017 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/35335 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
The rationale underpinning the use of relevant foreign judgments in court decisions about the interpretation and application of double tax agreements (DTAs) is based on the logic of common interpretation. Agreement on a common interpretation underpins the use of the OECD Model Commentary (the Commentary) as, first, an aid to negotiating DTAs and, secondly, their subsequent interpretation by taxpayers, administrators and the courts. |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Taxation Today |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
The Use of Foreign Court Decisions in New Zealand |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
4 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: THOMSON REUTERS |
en |
pubs.end-page |
7 |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
632864 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Law |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Faculty Administration Law |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2017-06-27 |
en |