dc.contributor.advisor |
Hay, D |
en |
dc.contributor.advisor |
Harrison, J |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Wang, Yitian |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-09-04T00:34:52Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/35471 |
en |
dc.description |
Full text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
In 2012, the Chinese version of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the China-SOX) was officially enacted. Inspired by the controversies among the US academic and business communities regarding the costs of compliance with the SOX-type legislation, this thesis examines whether the total private benefits of the enactment of China-SOX exceed its total private costs. In this thesis, the China-SOX is evaluated from two perspectives which are: 1) whether market investors perceive the enforcement of China-SOX as beneficial overall as reflected by the movements of stock prices, and 2) whether implementing China-SOX guidelines can lead to an improvement in company productivity and efficiency in the post-China-SOX period. The overall economic consequences of the enactment of China-SOX is examined via an event study which detects if there are significant market returns as well as stock returns around the dates of key China-SOXrelated events during the legislation preparation period. The effect of China-SOX on companies’ productivity and efficiency is examined in a DEA study setting, and Malmquist Index Analysis is conducted to find the productivity and efficiency changes between the pre-China-SOX period and the post-China-SOX period. The event study results provide no evidence to support the claim that the enactment of China-SOX is net beneficial. However, the results show that there are significant negative market returns around one of the China-SOX announcement events. Meanwhile, the results also suggest that, around the dates of the same China-SOX event, the returns of the mainboard listed companies that did not voluntarily disclose internal control audit opinions are significantly lower than the main-board listed companies with such disclosure. Both findings seem to add validity to the concern about the costs of China-SOX’s compliance. The DEA study results provide mixed evidence regarding the effect of China-SOX on company efficiency, as some of the sample industries show an overall efficiency improvement from the pre-China-SOX period to the post-China-SOX period whereas other industries show an overall efficiency decline. Collectively, the results of the event study and the DEA study do not support the claim that China-SOX is net beneficial. |
en |
dc.publisher |
ResearchSpace@Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Masters Thesis - University of Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.isreferencedby |
UoA99265048713502091 |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights |
Restricted Item. Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/nz/ |
en |
dc.title |
China’s Sarbanes-Oxley Act (China-SOX): Evidence on its Economic Consequences and its Effects on Company Efficiency |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Accounting |
en |
thesis.degree.grantor |
The University of Auckland |
en |
thesis.degree.level |
Masters |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: The author |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
657368 |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2017-09-04 |
en |
dc.identifier.wikidata |
Q112935215 |
|